第9章

类别:其他 作者:佚名字数:20671更新时间:18/12/14 16:48:45
Somesuchbusinessesorgroupsofbusinessespossessavirtualmonopolyofthemarket,andcancontroloutputandprices,soastosecureabnormaldividends。Suchcontrolis,tobesure,neverabsolute,itscontrolofpricesbeingsubjecttotwochecks,therestrictionofdemandwhichattendseveryriseofprices,andtheincreasingprobabilityofcompetitionspringingupifprofitsaretoohigh。Butqualifiedmonopolies,earningdividendsfarlargerthanareeconomicallynecessarytosupporttherequiredcapital,areeverywhereinevidence。Trusts,cartels,pools,combines,conferences,andtradeagreementsofvariouspotencyandstringency,pervadethemorehighlyorganisedindustries,substitutingtheprincipleofcombinationforthatofcompetition。Inallmajorbranchesofthetransporttradebylandandsea,inlargesectionsoftheminingindustry,intheironandsteelindustryandinmanybranchesofmachine-making,inmanyofthespecialisedtextiletrades,inthechemicalandothermanufactureswherespecialscientificknowledgecounts,inmanydepartmentsofwholesaleandretaildistribution,and,lastnotleast,inbanking,financeandinsurance,freedomofinvestmentandofcompetitionhavevirtuallydisappeared。Toassumethatfreshstreamsofcapital,labourandbusinessability, havelibertytoenterthesefieldsofenterprise,andbytheirequalcompetitionwiththebusinessesalreadyinpossessionsotoincreasetheoutput,lowersellingpricesandkeepinterestandprofitsatabare\'costs\'level,isachildishtravestyoftheknownconditionofthesetrades。Toaffirmthatsuchmobilityandlibertyofcompetitionisthesolenormal\'tendency\',andthatthemonopolisticandcombinativeforcesmerelyrepresentfriction,issograveafalsificationofthefactsastoputoutofcourtthewholemethodofeconomicinterpretationwhichisbasedthereon。Concretecapitalhasnoneofthequalitiesassignedtotheabstractcapitaloftheseeconomists。Itisneitherinfinitelydivisible,norabsolutelymobile,noraccuratelydirected,norlegallyandeconomically\'free\'todisposeitselfinanypartoftheindustrialsystemwherethecurrentinterestorprofitexceedstheaverage。Overlargetractsofindustrycombinationismorenormalandmorepotentthancompetition,andwherethisisnotthecase,themostcompetitivetradeswillbefoundhoneycombedwithobstructiveclots,businessesenjoyingspecialadvantagesandearningcorrespondinglyhighprofits。 §;13。Becausecertainqualitiesofbusinessabilityarerequisite,towitastuteness,keennessofjudgment,calculatingpower,determination,capacityfororganisationandexecutiveability,itissometimesclaimedthatthehighratesofprofitwhichaccruefromsuchbusinessesaswehaveindicatedarereallythecreation,notofmonopolyorcombination,butofthetalentsoftheseentrepreneurs。Buteventhoughitbeadmittedthatsomesuchabilityisessentialtoproduceortomaintainasuccessfulcombination,cantheentireprofitsofsuchacombinationbeimputedtothisabilityorregardedasitsnaturalandproperreward?Takethecommoninstanceofthe\'forestaller\',whostopsthesupplyofsomecommodityonitswaytoamarket,securesthewholesupplyatcompetitivepricesfromthevariouscontributors,andthensellsitatamonopolypricefixedbyhimself。Aretheprofitsofthiscorneraproductofabilityandarewardofability,andnota\'surplus\'representinganartificiallycontrivedscarcityvalue? Ortakethecaseofacontractingfirm,whichpersuadesalltheotherfirmsinapositiontocompetetocomeintoanarrangementastoaminimumtender。 Aretheextraprofitsduetosuchanarrangementtoberegardedaswagesofability,becausesometactwasneededtoworkthething?Butsupposewegrantedthewholecontention,andagreedthattheextradividendspaidtoshareholdersinfavouredorprotectedbusinesseswerereallyproducedbytheabilityoftheentrepreneurormanager,whatthen?Itisnotprovedthattheseextraprofitsare\'costs\',not\'surplus\'。Onthecontrary,thefactthattheycanbetakenasextradividendsorbonusesbytheownersofthecapital,insteadofpassingin\'wagesofability\'totheentrepreneur,isproofpositivethattheyaresurplus。Foriftheywereasubsistencewageofability,orevena\'prize\',essentialtoevokesomespecialoutputofskillorenergy,theycouldnotbethusdivertedfromtheentrepreneurtotheshareholders。Infact,thereisnoreasontosupposethatanyveryrareorconspicuousabilityisevincedinworkingasuccessfulpoolorcombine,oreveninorganisingasuccessfulbusiness。Stilllessistherereasontosupposethattheprofitsattendingsuchanenterpriseareinanywayproportionatetotheskillorenergyoftheentrepreneur。Everyoneisawarethatthecontraryisthecase。Indeed,sofarasscientific,professional,andbusinessabilityisindustriallyusefulandhasaclaimtoincome,enquiryshowsthatthereisnobettersecurityformobility,freedomofcompetitionandequalityofpayment,thaninthecaseofcapital。Inequalitiesofeconomicconditionsbetweenvariousclassesofourpopulation,involvinginequalitiesofnurtureandofeducation,andofeveryothersortof\'opportunity\' relevanttothediscovery,training,equipmentandsuccessof\'naturalability\',setupaseriesofalmostimpenetrablebarrierstothefreeflowofnaturalabilitythroughouttheindustrialsystem,andgiverisetoanelaboratehierarchyofrestrictedemploymentswheretheratesofremunerationrepresent,notanyinherentservicesofability,butthedegreeoftherestrictioninrelationtotheimportanceofthework。Allsuchadvantagesofopportunityarereflectedinratesofpaymentfor\'ability\'whichcarryelementsof\'surplus。\'Thoughsomeportionofthehigherremunerationpaidtosuccessfulprofessionalworkersmayberegardedasinterestuponthecapital-outlayoftheireducationandtraining,thereisnoreasontoholdthattheextrapaymentisadjustedtothecostsofthisoutlay。Stilllesscananysuchargumentavailinthecaseofhighbusinessprofits。Thoughabilityandexpensivetrainingmaybefavouringconditionstosuchfinancialsuccess,restrictedcompetitionmustbeaccountedtheprincipaldirectdeterminantofallsuchextrapayments。 §;14。Thereremainsonefinaldemurrertoourdoctrineoftheunproductive\'surplus\'。Ifyoutakeintoconsideration,itisurged,alltheunsuccessfulaswellasthesuccessfulbusinesses,youwillfindthattheaveragereturnforcapitalandforbusinessabilityislowenough,notinfactmorethanrepresentsabare\'costs\'economy。Similarlywiththehighincomesearnedbythefewsuccessfulmenintheprofessionsandinotherwalksoflife。 Setthefailuresfairlyagainstthesuccessesandthereisnonet\'surplus\' totakeaccountof。 Butthiscontentionisonemoreabuseofthemethodofaverages。Tothechargethatonemanisoverpaid,itisnoanswerthatanotherisunderpaid。 Tothestatementthatsurplusemergesinthepaymentforsomeordersofcapitalorabilityitisnoanswertosaythatothercapitalandabilitydoesnotevengetitstrue\'costs\'orsubsistencewages。Theforceofthisrebuttalisstillfurtherstrengthenedwhenitisrealisedtowhatextentthesuccessofthosewhosucceedisdirectlyresponsibleforthefailureofthosewhofail。Fortheeconomicstrengthofthosewhosesuperioradvantageshavesecuredforthemapositionofcontrolwillnecessarilyoperatetomakethecompetitionofoutsidersdifficultandtheirfailureprobable。 Indeed,aportionofthegainswhichcombinationyieldswilloftenbeconsciouslyappliedtokillthecompetitionofoutsiders,ortorestricttheirtradetothelessprofitableorthemoreprecariousformsofenterprise。Butevenwherethisbusinesspolicyisnotadopted,theveryfactthatstrongfirmsand\'combines\'controlmanymarkets,must,bylimitingtheareaoffreecompetition,intensifythecompetitionwithinthatareaandsocausethefailurestobenumerous。 Thecontention,thattheexcessiveprofitsofsuccessfulfirmsarebalancedandinsomewaycancelledbythelossesofthosethatfail,isalsocontradictedbythepsychologyofthecase。Ifitcouldbeshownthatthechanceofwinningthesehighgainswasinfactanecessaryinducementtothewinnerstostaketheircapitalandbusinesscapacityinaninherentlyriskylineofenterprise,theremightbesomeforceinthisplea。Buttothemenwhoachievethesesuccessesbusinessisnotasimplegameofhazardinwhichtheyhavemerelythesamechanceastheothers。Successiscommonlyachievedbyforce,strategyandthepossessionofknownadvantages,andisusedtostrengthentheseadvantagesandsotoincreasecontinuouslythe\'pull\'bywhichtheyaccumulatetheirgainsandruintheirwould-becompetitors。Althoughtightformsofmonopolyareveryrare,looseorpartialrestrictionsuponcompetitionareverynumerousandoftenveryprofitable。 Alltheseextragains,issuingfromvariousformsofnaturalorcontrivedscarcityinallsortsofindustries,arerightlyclassedasunproductivesurplus。Manyofthemareasconstantandascertainastheeconomicrentsofland,ariseinthesamewayfromalimitationofsomeproductivefactor,andare\'unearned\'incomeinthesamesenseofthatterm。Otherofthesegainsaremorefluctuating,proceedingfromlessstableformsofprivilegeorcombination,butwhiletheyexisttheyequallybelongtounproductive\'surplus。\'8 §;15。Thedistinctionbetweenthatportionofthesocialincomewhichgoesasnecessarypaymentstosupportandevoketheenergiesofbodyandmindofwealth-producers,i。e。,costsofproduction,andthatwhichgoesasunproductive\'surplus\'tothosewho,possessingsomenecessaryinstrumentofproductionthatisrelativelyscarce,canexactascarcityprice,isfundamentalinavaluationofindustry。Forthissurplusnotonlyrepresentssheereconomicwaste,regardedfromthesocialstandpoint,butitcanbeshowntobedirectlyresponsible,asanefficientcause,formostofthoseparticularmaladiesinourcurrentprocessesofproductionandconsumptionwhichimpedetheeconomicandthehumanprogressofthenation。 Forifouranalysisofthissurplusiscorrect,itconsistsintheseizureofalargeportionofthefruitsofindividualandsocialproductiveenergies,requiredforthefullsupportandfurtherstimulationoftheseenergiesandforthewiderhumanlifewhichtheyaredesignedtoserve,andtheirassignmenttopersonswhohavenothelpedtomakethem,donotneedthem,andcannotusethem。Thepaymentofsurplustakeslargesectionsoftheincome,neededtoraisetheeconomicandhumanefficiencyoftheworking-classes,ortoenablesocietytoenlargethescopeandtoimprovethequalityofthepublicservices,anddisposestheminwaysthatarenotmerelywastefulbutinjurious。Ineffect,alltheexcessivehumancostsofproductionandallthedefectivehumanutilitiesofconsumption,whichourseparateanalysisofthetwoprocessesdisclosed,findtheirconcreteandcondensedexpressioninthis\'surplus\'。Thechiefinjuriesitcausesmaybesummarisedasfollows: (1)。Flowingabundantlyas\'unearned\'incomeintothepossessionof\'wealthy\'individualsandclasses,ittherebycauseslargequantitiesofthenationalincometobeconsumedwithlittleornobenefit。Formuch,ifnotmost,ofthissurplus,beingdevotedtoluxury,waste,extravaganceand\'illth\',furnishesbyitsexpenditurenothumanutilitybuthuman\'cost\',notanenhancementbutadiminutionofthesumofhumanwelfare。 (2)Byenablingitsrecipientstodisobeythesoundbiologicalandmoralprecept,\'inthesweatofthyfacethoushalteatbread,\'itcallsintobeingandsustainsaleisuredorunemployedclasswhoseexistencerepresentsalossofproductiveenergyandofwealth-productiontothenation。 (3)Theevilprestigeandattractionofthelifeofsensationalfrivolitythisidleclassisdisposedtoleadtendsbysuggestiontosapthewholesomerespectforworkinthestandardsoftherestofthecommunity,andtoencouragebyservileimitationinjuriousorwastefulmethodsofexpenditure。 (4)Theeconomicnecessityofproducingthissurplusimposesexcessivetoilupontheproductiveclasses,beingdirectlyresponsibleforthelonghoursandspeeding-upwhichconstitutetheheaviestburdenofhumancosts。 Thedirectionwhichtheexpenditureofthesurplusgivestocapitalandlabourdegradesthecharacteroflargebodiesofworkersbysettingthemtofutile,frivolous,viciousorserviletasks。 (5)Thedisturbingirregularityofthetradeswhichsupplythecapriciousandever-shiftingconsumption,uponwhichthe\'surplus\'issolargelyspent,imposesupontheworkersagreatcostintheshapeofirregularityofemployment,andaconsiderableburdenofcostlysavingbywayofinsuranceagainstthisirregularity。 (6)Bystampingwiththebadgeofirrationalityandinequitythegeneralprocessofapportionmentofincome,thesurplusimpairsthatspiritofhumanconfidenceandthatconsciousnessofhumansolidarityofinterestswhicharethebeststimuliofindividualandsocialprogress。 Thesurpluselementinprivateincomethusrepresentsthehumanlossfromdefectsinthecurrentdistributionofwealth,notonlythelossfromwastefulandinjuriousconsumptionbutfromwastefulandinjuriousproduction,anexaggerationofhumancostsandadiminutionofhumanutilities。Theprimaryobjectofallsocial-economicreformsshouldbetodissipatethissurplusandtosecureitsapportionmentpartlyasusefulincomeforindividualproducers,partlyasusefulincomeforsociety,sothat,insteadofpoisoningthesocialorganismasitdoesnow,itmaysupplyfullernourishmentandstimulustothelifeofthatorganismanditscells。 Thusdirected,partlyintohigherwagesofefficiencyforworkers,partlyintofurtherincomefortheenrichmentofthecommonlife,the\'surplus\' willineffectceasetobesurplus,beingcompletelyabsorbedinsatisfyingthehumanrequirementsofindividualsandsociety。Fornotonlywillitfurnishtheexpenditurerequiredtobringthestandardofconsumptionofallgradesofworkersuptothelevelofafullsatisfactionofhumanneeds,butitwillestablishanentirelynewconceptionofpublicincome。Foritwillberecognisedthatthepublicrevenue,takeneitherbytaxationorasprofitsofpublicindustry,isearnedbypublicworkpreciselyastherevenueofindividualsisearnedbyprivatework,andisrequiredforpublicconsumptionjustasprivateincomeisrequiredforprivateconsumption。 Thusthewholeofwhatnowfiguresasawasteful\'surplus\'wouldbeappliedinproductiveconsumption。 Thescopeoftheoperationofthisorganiclaw,ofcourse,widelytranscendsthisspecialapplicationtothedistributionofeconomicincome。Itisthegenerallawoforderandofprogressinalldepartmentsoforganicactivity。Butforourtask,thatofahumanvaluationofindustry,itsworthissupreme。ForintheapplicationoftheorganiclawofdistributionallthegreatantagonismswhichloomsobigassocialProblems,LuxuryandPoverty,Toilandidleness,TheindividualandSociety,AuthorityandLiberty,findtheirsolution。9 NOTES: 1。Eventhereheisnotseparatedinphysicalfunctions。Thesexual,philoprogenitive,andthegregariousinstincts,whicharerootedinphysicalstructure,negatephysicalindividualism。Sodoesthestructureofhisbrain,whichinsolitudedecaysorbecomesdiseased。 2。TheCommon-senseofPoliticalEconomy,p。698。 3。p。345。 4。WorkandWages,Vol。I,p。14。 5。ProfessorPigou(WealthandWelfare,p。176),thoughadoptingthegeneralpositionofmarginalism,makesaconcession,astoitsapplicability,whichisavirtualadmissionofitsfutility。Forbyshowingthatonlyin\'industriesofconstantreturns\'are\'supplyprice\'and\'marginalsupplyprice\'equal,andthatinindustriesof\'decreasing\'orof\'increasing\' returnsthereexistsatendencytoexceedortofallshortof\'themarginalnetproductyieldedinindustriesingeneral,\'hevirtuallyendorsesthecriticismthat\'marginalism\'assumesastaticalconditionofindustry。 Foronlyinastaticalconditionwouldallindustriesbefoundconformingtoconstantreturns:theoperationofincreasingordiminishingreturnsmeansnothingelsethanthatchangesinvolumeormethodsofproductionareraisingorloweringproductivityandremunerationaboveorbelowtheequallevelwhich\'marginalism\'desiderates。 6。Fromthestandpointoftheindividualbusinessfirm\'costsofproduction\' mayincludemanyhigherratesofpayments,necessaryundertheactualconditionsofcompetitiveindustrytosecuretheuseoftherequiredagents。 7。Foritmustbekeptinmindthatthe\'productiveexpenditure\'towhichreferenceisheremadereferultimatelytoastandardnotofmarketbutofhumanvalues。 8。Economists,followingtheclassicaldistinctionmadebyAdamSmithinthecaseoflandvalues,maybreakupthesurplusintovariousspeciesofscarcityrentsontheonehandanddifferentialrentsontheother。 Ascarcityor\'specific\'rentwilloccurwhenthewholesupplyofsomefactorofproduction,e。g。,allthelandavailableforsomeparticularuse,orallthecapitalemployedinsometrade,isinapositiontotakeapaymenthigherthanisobtainablewheremorelandorcapitalisavailableforthisparticularusethanisrequiredtoturnoutthesupplyofgoodsthatisactuallysold。TheworsthoplandinuseinEnglandobtainsapositiverent,theworstequippedshipsintheAtlanticcombineobtainasurplus-profit: betteracresofhopland,better-equippedshipsobtainadifferentialrentorprofitinaddition。Bothspecificgainanddifferentialgainaresurplus,andthebasisofeachisascarcityofsupplyandarestraintofcompetition。 9。Foradetailedandmoretechnicaldefenceofthefundamentallyimportantdistinctionbetween\'costs\'and\'surplus\'andforacloseranalysisofthesourcesof\'unproductivesurplus,\'readersmaybereferredtotheauthor\'searlierwork,TheIndustrialSystem:anenquiryintoearnedandunearnedincome。(Longman\'s2ndandrevisededition,1909)。CHAPTERXIII:THEHUMANCLAIMSOF LABOUR §;1。ThevalidityofthehumanlawofdistributioniswelltestedbyconsideringthelightitshedsuponthemodernclaimsofLabourandtheMovementwhichisendeavouringtorealisetheseclaims。ForthesignificanceoftheLabourMovementwillcontinuetobemisunderstoodsolongasitisregardedasameredemandforalargerquantityofwagesandofleisure,importantastheseobjectsare。TherealdemandofLabourisatoncemoreradicalandmorehuman。ItisademandthatLabourshallnolongerbeboughtandsoldasadeadcommoditysubjecttothefluctuationsofDemandandSupplyinthemarket,butthatitsremunerationshallberegulatedonthebasisofthehumanneedsofafamilylivinginacivilisedcountry。 Atpresentmostsortsoflabourersarepaidaccordingtothequantityoflabour-powertheygiveout,andaccordingtothemarket-pricesetuponaunitofeachseveralsortoflabour-power。Thismeansthattheactual weeklyearningsofsomegradesoflaboureraremuchhigherthanthoseofothergrades,notbecausetheworktakesmoreoutofthem,orbecauseitinvolvesahigherstandardofliving,butbecausesomenatural,somefortuitous,orsomeorganisedscarcityofsupplyexistsintheformergrades,whilethereisabundanceofsupplyinthelatter。1Moreover,theweeklyearningsforanyofthesesortsoflabourwillvaryfromweektoweek,frommonthtomonth,oryeartoyear,withthevariationsofSupplyandDemandintheLabourMarket。Theincomeoftheworkingfamilywillthusvaryforreasonsutterlybeyonditscontrol,thoughitsrequirementsforeconomicandhumanefficiencyshownosuchvariation。Thusthereisnosecurityforanyclassstandardofliving。 Withineachclassorgradeoflabourtherewillbevariationsoftheindividualfamilywage,basedontheamountoflabour-poweractuallygivenoutintheweek。Alesseffectiveworker,eventhoughheputsoutasmucheffort,willearnlessmoneythanamoreeffective。Thisseemsnecessary,reasonableandevenjust,solongasweaccepttheordinaryviewthatlabourshouldbeboughtandsoldlikeanyothercommodity。 Butonceaccepttheviewthattobuylabour-power,likeothercommodities,atapricedeterminedpurelybyrelationsofSupplyandDemand,isapolicydangeroustothelifeandwell-beingoftheindividualwhoselabour-poweristhusboughtandsold,tothoseofhisfamilyandofsociety,yourattitudetowardsthelabour-movementingeneral,andeventocertaindemandswhichatfirstsightseemunreasonable,willundergoagreatchange。 ThefundamentalassumptionoftheLabourMovement,initsdemandsforreformedremuneration,isthattheprivatehumanneedsofaworkingfamilyshouldberegularlyandsecurelymetoutofweeklypay。Thelifeandhealthofthefamily,andthatsenseofsecuritywhichisessentialtosoundcharacterandregularhabits,totheexerciseofreasonableforesight,andtheformationandexecutionofreasonableplans,allhingeuponthiscentraldemandforasufficiencyandregularityofweeklyincomebaseduponthehumanneedsofafamily。 §;2。Thisexplainsaliketheworking-classobjectionstopiecework,thedemandforaminimumwage,andthepolicyoflimitationofindividualoutput。Forpiece-work,evenmorethantime-work,isbaseduponatotalignoringofthehumanconditionswhichaffectthegivingoutoflabour-power。 Itistheplainestandmostlogicalassertionofthecommodityviewoflabour,themostcompletedenialthatthehumanneedsoftheworkerhaveanyclaimtodeterminewhatheshouldbepaid。 Sofirmly-rootedinthebreastoftheordinarynon-workingman,andofmanyworking-men,isthenotionthataman,whohasproducedtwiceaslargeanoutputasanotherman,ought,asasimplematterofrightorjustice,toreceiveapaymenttwiceaslarge,thatitisverydifficulttodislodgeit。Itrepresentsthegreatesttriumphofthebusinesspointofviewoverhumanity。Ifamanhasdonetwiceasmuch,ofcoursebeoughttoreceivetwiceasmuch!Itseemsanethicaltruism。AndyetIventuretoaffirmthatithasnothingethicalinit。Ithasassumedthismoralguisebecauseofadeepdistrustofhumannaturewhichitexpresses。Howwillyougetamantodohisbestunlessyoupayhimaccordingtotheamounthedoes? Itisthispurelypracticalconsiderationthathasimposeduponthepiece-worksystemtheappearanceofaxiomaticjustice。 Itisnotdifficulttostripoffthespuriousethicsoftheprinciple。 Yousaythatpiece-wagesorpaymentbyresultisrightbecauseitinducesmentodotheirbest。Butwhatdowemeanby\'doingtheirbest。\'?Aweakmanmayhewonetonofcoalswhileastrongmanmayhewtwo。Hasnottheformer\'donehisbest\'equallywiththelatter?Thestrengthofastrongman,thenaturaloreventheacquiredskillofaskilfulman,cannotbeassumedasapersonalmeritwhichdeservesrewardinthetermsofpayment。 Ifthereismeritanywhere,itisintheeffort,notintheachievementorproduct,andpiece-wagesmeasureonlythelatter。 No!thereisnothinginherentlyjustinthepiece-wagesystem。Itsrealdefenceisthatitisthemostpracticalwayofgettingmentoworkashardastheycan:itisacheckonskulkingandsugaring。Itassumesthatnoothereffectivemotivecanbemadeoperativeinbusinessexceptquantityofpayment。 §;3。AsRuskinandmanyothershaveremarked,thelieisgiventothisassumptioninanincreasingnumberofkindsofworkwherethehighestqualitiesofhumanpower,thefinestsortsofmentalskillandresponsibility,areinvolved。Publicservantsofallgrades,fromCabinetMastersandJudgesdowntomunicipaldustmen,arepaidbysalaries,notbypiece-wages。Thesameistrueofthemoreremunerativeandmoreresponsibleworkinprivatebusinesses。NoGovernment,noprivatefirm,buystheservicesofitsmostvaluableemployeesatthelowestmarket-price,orattemptstoapplytothemapiece-workscale。Itwouldnotpaythemtodoso,andtheyknowit。Noristhismerelybecausesomesortsofworkdonoteasilyadmitofbeingmeasuredbythepiece。ItwouldbepossibletopayJudges,ascounselarepaid,bythecase。CabinetMinistersmightbepaidonpiece-wagesforLawsmeasuredbythenumberorlengthoftheirclauses。Thechiefreasonforadoptingpaymentbyfixedsalaryisthatitisreckonedawisemodeofsecuringgoodindividualservices。Itisrecognisedthat eachpieceofworkwillbebetterdone,iftheworkerssetaboutitinathoroughlydisinterestedmanner,concentratedintheirthoughtsandfeelingsentirelyontheworkitself,andnotentangledintheconsiderationofwhattheyaretogetoutofit。Thisissupposedtobethedifferencebetweentheprofessionalmanandthetradesman,thattheformerperformsafunctionandincidentallyreceivesafee,whilethelatter,bytheveryactsofbuyingandsellingthatconstitutehisbusiness,keepshismindsetupontheprofitfromeachseveraltransaction。 Butthefixedandguaranteedsalaryforpublicservantshasanotherground。Itmayprofitabusinessfirmtopractiseaneconomyofsweating,todriveitsemployeesandconsumetheirhealthandstrengthbyafewyears\' excessivetoil,totakeonnewcasualworkersforbriefspurtsoftrade,tosackemployeesruthlessly,assoonastradebeginstoflag,ortheirindividualpowersofworkareimpairedbyage。Apiece-worksystem,withnoguaranteeofemploymentorofweeklywage,maybeasoundbusinesseconomyforaprivatefirm。ItcannotbeasoundeconomyforaStateoraMunicipality。 ForalargeandincreasingshareoftheworkandtheexpenditureofmostStatesandMunicipalitiesisappliedintryingtomendoralleviatedamagesordangerstothehealth,security,intelligence,andcharacteroftheworkersandtheirfamilies,arisingfrominsufficiencyofworkandwagesorotherdefectsofprivateindustrialism。Itwouldobviouslybebadpubliceconomytobreakdownthelivesandhomesofpublicemployeesbyunderpayingoroverworkingthem,orbydismissingandleavingthemtostarvewhenworkwasslack。Forwhatwassavedinthewage-billoftheparticulardepartment,wouldbesquanderedinpoor-law,police,hospitals,old-agepensions,invalidityandemploymentrelief。Noristhatall。A massofill-paid,ill-housedworkers,alternatelyoverworkedandoutofwork,standsasachiefbarrierineveryoneofthosepathsofsocialprogressandnationaldevelopmentwhichmodernstatecraftsetsitselftofollow。 Thelowwageofunskilledlabouristo-dayasourceofinfinitewasteoftheforcesofnationaleducation。Stillkeepingourargumentuponthenarrowestlinesofeconomy,weplainlyrealisethatthefinancialresources,uponwhichtheStatecandrawforallherservices,dependinthelastresortuponthegeneraleconomicefficiencyoftheworkingpopulation,andthatasystemofpublicemploymentwhichwas,howeverindirectly,detrimentaltothishealth,longevityandintelligence,wouldrankasbadbusinessfromthepublicstandpoint。 Itispossiblethatinthiscountrythesalarymodeofpaymentisgainingground。Apartfromthepublicservices,nationalandmunicipal,whichnowemploysome7percentofthetotalemployedpopulation,thegreattransportandthedistributiveindustriesarealmostentirelyrunuponthesalarybasis。Thesedepartmentsofindustryareconstantlyincreasing,notonlyinabsolutesize,butintheproportionofthetotalemploymenttheyafford。 Tothemmustbeaddedthelargeclassofdomesticservice。Suchgreatsalariedservicescannot,indeed,beclaimedastriumphsfortheorganicprincipleofdistribution,orpaymentaccordingtoneeds。Forthemostparttheyareveryunsatisfactorymodificationsofthepiece-wageorcommodityviewoflabour。For,exceptforthesmallhighergradesofofficials,theymostlyretainthetwochiefdefectsoftheordinarywage-system,apaymentofweeklyincomenotbasedonapropercomputationofhumanneeds,andalackofadequatesecurityoftenure。Overalargepartofthefieldofindustryandcommercewhereweeklyfixedsalariesarepaid,thereexistsaflagrantdisregardforallconsiderationsofhumansubsistence。Someoftheworse,thoughnottheworst,formsof\'sweating\'arefoundinshops,workshopsandfactorieswherewomenareemployedonweeklysalaries。 Nonetheless,itremainstruethatthesalaryisamorerationalformofpaymentforlabourthanthetimeorpiecewage,andthat,asthehumanisationofindustryproceeds,itwillmoreandmoredisplacethewage-system。Forwheresalariesarepaid,theconsiderationofneedsorsubsistencedoestendalwaystoqualifythemerecommodityviewoflabour。 Piece-wageortime-wageignorestheworkerasahumanbeingandthesupporterofafamily:itignoreshimasapersonalityandregardshimmerelyasaninstrumentforgivingoutunitsofproductivepowertobepaidforonthesametermsastheunitsofmechanicalpowerusedinworkingmachinery。 §;4。TheLabourMovementinsiststhatthepersonalandhumanfactorisfundamentalasaconditioninthelabourbargain。Iflabouristreatedasamerecommodity,itspriceaffordsnosecurityoflifetothelabourer。 Itmaynotfindacustomeratall,andsohestarvesandwithhimhisfamily,thefuturesupplyoflabour。Or,lefttothefluctuationsofthemarket,itmaysellatapricewhichisinsufficientforhismaintenance。Thefluctuationsofpriceinallothermarketsinvolveonlythepecuniaryprofitorlossofthosewhosell,fluctuationsofthepriceoflabourinvolvetheexistenceandwell-beingofhumanfamiliesandofthenation。Hencetheattackoforganisedlabouronthiswholeconceptionofthelabour-market,andthedemandthattheremunerationoflabourshallnotbelefttothehigglingofamarket。 Thechieffightisforasecureweeklyincome,orforconditionsofemploymentwhichleaduptothis。Aminimumoralivingwageistheusualnamegiventothisdemand。Complaintismadeofthevaguenessofthedemand。 Butthisvaguenessdoesnotmakethedemandunreasonable。Alivingwageindeediselasticaslifeitself:itexpandsandwillcontinuetoexpand,withthedevelopmentoflifefortheworkers。Butwhatineffectismeantatthepresentbyalivingorsubsistencewageissucharegularweeklysumassufficestomaintaintheordinaryworkingfamilyinhealthandeconomicefficiency。 Itiscontendedthatnopurchaseoflabourshouldbepermittedwhichentailsthedegradationofthatstandard。Whenaminimumrateofpiece-wagesisdemanded,theimplicitunderstandingisthatitissuchaswillyieldundernormalconditionstheordinaryweeklysubsistenceorstandardwage。 Sincepiece-wagesaresofirmlyestablishedinmanytradesthatitisimpracticabletodemandtheirimmediateabolition,theactualstrugglebetweenemployeesandemployersisastowhetherthesepiece-wagesshallbeallowedtofluctuateindefinitely,beingdraggedattheheelsofthepricesofcommodities,orwhetheranabsolutelimitshallbesetupontheirfall。Theemployersays,\'Whentradeisgoodandpricesandprofitshigh,labourwillsharetheprosperityinhighratesofwageandlargeweeklyearnings:so,whentradeisbadandpricesandprofitslow,labourmustsharethisadversityandtakelow。pay,Organisedlabourreplies,\'No,thereisnoparitybetweenthepowerofcapitalandoflabourtobeardepressions:capitalisstrongandcanbearupagainstlowprofitswithoutperishing,labourisweakandcannotbearupagainstlowwages。Wewillonlysellourlabour-poweronconditionthatalowerlimitissetuponitsprice,suchalimitaswillenablethelabourertokeepbodyandsoultogether,andtomaintainthatefficiencywhichconstituteshisworkingcapital。Thisminimumwageshouldberegardedasafixedcostinyourproduction。Atpresentthepricesofyourgoodsoscillatewithoutanyassignedlimit。Youacceptlowcontractsforwork,andthenadducethislowpriceasareasonforreducingwages。 Letaminimumwageoncebeadoptedinthetrade,andcontractpricescannotbeacceptedonsolowalevel。Theminimumwagewillthushelptosteadysellingpricesandtoregulateemploymentandoutput。\' Boththeeconomicsandthesocialethicsofthislabourcontentionareinsubstancesound。Solongasthepriceoflabourislefttohigglinginacompetitivemarket,thereisnothingtopreventthewagesfallingtothelowestlevelatwhichasufficientnumberofworkerscanbeinducedtoconsenttowork,andthatlevelmayinvolveareductionofthestandardoflivingintheirfamiliesbelowthetruesubsistencepoint。Thefixingofwagesbyso-calledfreecompetitionaffordsnosecurityforafamilywageofefficiencyorevenofsubsistence。Thereshouldbenomistakeuponthisessentialmatter。Thedoctrineof\'economyofhighwages\'hasnosuchgeneralefficacyasissometimessuggested。Thoughinmanycaseshighwagesareessentialtomaintainandevoketheenergyandefficiencyrequired,inothercasestheyarenot。Fromthestandpointoftheimmediateprofitsofemployers\'sweating\'oftenpays。Butfromthestandpointofsocietyitneverpays。 Therefore,thepolicyoftheorganisedworkers,inseekingtoenforcethedoctrineofaminimumwage,isnotonlyapolicyofself-preservationfortheworking-classesbutasalutarysocialpolicy。ItisforthisreasonthattheStateintervenesinfavourofthepractice,establishingTradeBoardstoenforceitsapplicationinso-called\'sweatedtrades\',andacknowledges,intheoryatanyrate,itsvalidityinallpublicemploymentsandpubliccontracts。 §;5。Althoughthisminimumwageistolerablyremotefromtheidealofafixedweeklysalaryinmosttrades,itisatruestepinthisdirection。 Themostcontroverteditemintrade-unionpolicy,thelimitationofindividualoutput,isalsopartlyactuatedbythesamemotive。Fewthingsmaketheordinarybusinessmanmoreindignantthanthetrade-unionregulationsincertaintradeswhichrestrainstrongerorquickerworkersfromputtingforththeirfullproductiveenergy。Theydenouncealikeitsdishonestyanditsbadeconomy。Itisbased,theysay,uponthe\'lumpoflabour\'fallacy,thefalsenotionthatthereexistsanabsolutelylimitedamountofemployment,orworktobedone,andthatifthestrongerorquickermendomorethantheirshare,theotherswillgoshort。Thisrefusaltoalloweachmantodohisbest,liketherelatedrefusalto getthefullworkoutofnewlabour-savingmachinery,appearsmonstrouslyperverseandwicked。But,thoughpartlyanimatedbyshort-sightedeconomicviews,thispolicyisnotentirelytobethusexplained。Thelevellingdownoftheoutputofallworkerstoastandardhaspartlyforitsobjecttheestablishmentofgreaterevennessofincomeamongtheworkersinatrade。Atanygiventimeinagivenmill,orfactorytown,theactualamountofavailableemploymentislimited,andforthetimeitistruethatbylimitationofindividualoutputalargernumberofworkersareemployed,andalargernumberofworkingfamiliesareprovidedwithanormalwage,thanwouldhavebeenthecaseifacertainnumberofmenwereencouragedtoanunrestrictedenergyandunlimitedovertime。 Inthelongrun,itmaybebettertoencouragefullindividuallibertyofoutput,evenintheinterestoftheaggregateofemployment,buttherestraintstowhichiherealludebecomemoreintelligiblewhentheyareregardedasattemptstoenforceacommonclassweeklywagebymeansofanevendistributionofemployment。 Aminimumpiece-wage,basedonamoderatecomputationoftheweeklyoutputperworker,andaccompaniedbyasubstantialsecurityoffullregularemployment,wouldineffectplacethepiece-workerinthepositionofasalariedemployee。But,ofcourse,aminimumpiece-wage,howeverhigh,doesnotgofartothisend,unlesssecurityoftenureatfairlyfullemploymentisobtained。Theproblemofun-andunder-employmentandofirregularemploymentisnowbeginningtoberecognisedinitsfullsocialgravity。Aweeklywageofbareefficiencywithregularemploymentissociallyfarsuperiortoahigheraveragewageaccompaniedbygreatirregularityofwork。Theformeradmitsstabilityofmodesoflivingandreadymoneypayments:itconducestosteadinessofcharacterandprovisionforthefuturewithoutanxiety。Rapidandconsiderablefluctuationsofwages,evenwithfullemployment,aredamagingtocharacterandstabilityofstandards:butirregularityofemploymentisthemostdestructiveagencytothecharacter,thestandardofcomfort,thehealthandsanityofwage-earners。Theknowledgethatheisliableatanytime,fromcommercialornaturalcausesthatlieentirelyoutsidehiscontrol,tolosetheopportunitytoworkandearnhislivelihood,takesoutofamanthatconfidenceinthefundamentalrationalityoflifewhichisessentialtosoundnessofcharacter。Religion,ethics,education,canhavelittleholduponworkersexposedtosuchpowerfulillustrationsoftheunreasonandinjusticeofindustryandofsociety。 Theregularisationofindustry,soastoaffordsubstantialguaranteesoffullregularemployment,thusrankswiththeminimumwageasthemostsubstantialcontributiontowardsthesubstitutionofsalaryforwages,whichtheorganiclawofDistributionrequires。TheStateisbeginningtocooperatewiththeLabourMovementfortheattainmentofthissocialobject,stimulatingemployerstoorganisetheirindustriessoastofurnishamoreevenvolumeofemployment。 §;6。ThisinterpretationoftheLabourMovementasahalf-consciousmanifoldendeavourtorescuetheremunerationofLabourfromtherisksanddefectsofthecompetitivelabourmarket,andtoestablishitonaneconomyofhumanneeds,isnotfullyunderstoodwithoutsomefurtherreferencetotheactionoforganisedsociety。TheLabourMovement,initsendeavourtogetabetterdistributionoftheincome,isnotconfinedtotryingtosecureasatisfactoryminimumorstandardwage,fortifiedbygreatersecurityofworkandpersonalinsuranceagainstunemployment。Itseeksalsotosupplementitswagesbycooperativeandpublicprovisions。 Thecooperativemovementisanattempttoconvertintorealwagessomeoftheprofitsofemployersandshareholdersinmanufacturingandcommercialbusinesses,soenlargingtheproportionoftherealincomeofthenationwhichgoestotheremunerationoflabour。ButthegrowingattachmentoftheLabourOrganisationstopoliticsisequallymotivedbytheendeavourtosecurefromtheState,notmerelylegalsupportsforhigherwagesandimprovedconditionsofemployment,butactualsupplementstowagesintheshapeofcontributionsfromthepublicservicestotheirstandardofliving。 Freeeducation,old-agepensions,andpublicsubsidiestowardsinsuranceareadirectcontributionfromtheStatetothehigherstandardoflifewhichmoderncivilisedsocietydemands。Health,education,recreation,andprovisionagainstemergencies,arecomingmoreandmoretoberecognisedasproperobjectsofgovernmentalaction,andotherimportantservices,suchastransport,credit,art,musicandliterature,arefaronthewaytobecomingcommunal supplies。Althoughthesemodesofsocialprovisionmaybechieflymotivedbyconsiderationsofpublichealthandothercommongoods,theyneverthelessmustrankascontributionstothestandardofcomfortandwell-beingoftheworking-classfamilieswhoarethespecialbeneficiaries。Relieving,astheydoinmanyinstances,theprivateincomesoftheworkersfromexpenditurewhichotherwisethefamilywouldfindittoitsprivateinteresttoincur,thesegrowingpublicservicesformagenuineandaconsiderablecontributiontotheavailablerealincomeoftheworking-classes。Sofarasbytaxationdirectorindirectthecostofsuchpublicservicescanbeconsideredaburdenupon,oradeductionfromthewage-incomeoftheworkers,itforms,ofcourse,nonetadditiontotheirshare,butisonlyapubliccontrolovermethodsofexpenditure。 Butinasmuchasthedistincttendencyofmoderntaxationistowardsanincreasingtaxationoftheincomesandpropertyofthenon-workingclasses,thesepublicservicesrankassupplementaryincome,paidinkind,andtendingtoequalisethestandardoflivingofindividualworkersandgradesofworkers。ThecriticismsometimesdirectedagainstthisStatesocialism,uponthegroundthatittendstoweakentheforceofwage-bargainingandtransferstotheshouldersof\'society\'costswhichemployerswouldotherwisehavetobearintheshapeofhighermoneywages,wouldhaveconsiderableforce,iftheoldlaissez-faireprincipleof\'freecontract\'wereallowedotherwisetoworkunimpeded。Butthis,aswesee,isnotthecase。Thegrowingpolicyofminimumandstandardrates,supportedbypublicopinionand,wherenecessary,bypubliclaw,andhardeningintoapolicyoffixedsalaries,isnowiseinconsistentwithasimultaneousdevelopmentofcommunalsuppliesofgoodsandserviceswhichusuallyliealittleabovethenormalstandardofcomfortofthosewhoarethechiefbeneficiaries。 ThegrowingpoliticalactivitiesofalabourmovementwhichonceeschewedStateaidsnotmerelyattestthegeneralgrowthofconsciousdemocracybutimplyarecognitionofthedirectcontributionwhichtheStateismakingtowardsageneraldistributionofthenationalincomeinaccordancewithaneconomyofhumanneeds。 NOTES: 1。Thewidthofvariationsintheweeklyearnings,involvinginmostinstancesanearlycorrespondingvarietyoffamilyincome,maybeillustratedbythefollowingestimatecompiledbyMr。Webb,fromacarefulanalysisofofficialwagereturns。NewStatesman,May10,1913。 CHAPTERXIV:SCIENTIFICMANAGEMENT §;1。Nohumanisttreatmentofmodernindustrycanignoretherecentadvancesofscientificmethodsintotheregulationbothofstandardsofproductionandstandardsofconsumption。Inbothartsalikethecrudeempiricismofthepastisgivingplacetoamoreordered,consciousrationalism。Asisonlynatural,theadvanceofscienceismorerapidintheproductivearts。 Inrecentyearsmanyscatteredattemptshavebeenmadetoapplyphysiologyandpsychologytoeconomicprocesses。Businessmenbyscientificobservationandexperimenthavebroughtcriticismtobearuponthetraditionalandempiricalmodesoforganisingandconductingbusinesses。Themoreorlesshand-to-mouthmethodswhichwerepossibleinsmallbusinesseswherethemanagerwasowner,andcouldkeepaclosepersonalsupervisionofhisemployeesandalltheirwork,werefoundincreasinglyunsuitabletomoderntypesoflargecapitalistbusiness。Itwasnecessarytodeviseregularmethodsforcorrelatingtheworkofthedifferentdepartments,andforenablingasinglecentralpurposetooperatebycomplexdelegationthroughseveralgradesofsubordinateofficialswithautomaticchecksandregisters。Moreaccuratemethodsofbook-keeping,especiallyofcost-taking,weredevised; experimentsweremadeinbonuses,profit-sharing,fines,pace-makingandvariousmodificationsofthewage-systemsappliedtoevokemoreenergy,skill,orcarefromtheworkersandofficials;hoursoflabourandshift-systemsweresubjectedtomeasuredtests。Stillmorerecentlythedetailedtechnologyofmanualandmentallabourhasbeenmadematerialofphysiologicalandpsychologicalinvestigation。ScientificManagementhasbecomeaconsciousart。BusinesscollegesinAmericaandgermanygivecoursesofinstructioninthisart,andanewprofessionhasarisenofexpertadviserswhoarecalledinasspecialiststodiagnosethedeficienciesorwastesofindustrialorfinancialpowerinparticularbusinessesandtoprescriberemedies。 Economicprogress,regardedfromthestandpointofthebusinessman,consistsingettingagivenquantityofsaleablegoodsturnedoutatalowercostofproduction。Thatcostofproductionconsistsofthesalariesandwagespaidtovariousgradesofemployeesformentalandmanuallabour,costofmaterialsandpower,standingexpensesformaintenanceofplantandpremises,includingreplacementandinsurance,andinterestuponcapital。 Anythingthatreducesanyoneofthesecosts,withoutacorrespondingincreaseofanother,isprofitablefromthestandpointoftheindividualemployer,orofallemployersinthetrade,ifitbegenerallyadopted,oroftheconsumingpublic,ifitwhollyorpartlygoestotheminlowersellingprices。Wherethereductionofcostssimplytakestheshapeofreducedwagesforthesamework,however,itcausesnonetincreaseofconcretewealth,butmerelydistributesthesameamount(orlessbyreasonofreducedefficiencyoflabour)inadifferentmanner。Suchareductioncannotthenberegardedaseconomicprogress,fromthenationalstandpoint。 Buteveryotherreductionofcostcarrieswithitprimafacieevidenceofanetincreaseofconcretewealth。Inventionsofmachinery,improvedchemicalorothertreatmentofmaterials,betterbusinessorganisationandsubdivisionoflabour,improvedskillandenergyinemployees,betterbook-keeping,credit,marketingarrangements,——allsuchtechnicalimprovementspromotetheincreaseofconcretewealth。Inallthesewaysmanygreatadvanceshavebeenmadeinvariousindustries。But,alikeininventionandinorganisation,toomuchhasbeenlefttochance,ortothepressureofsomeemergency,toolittleistheresultoforderedthought。Businesshasbeenconductedtoomuchinthespiritofanart,toolittleinthatofappliedscience。 Themoderntendencyistointroducetheexactermethodsofscience。Themodernlargemanufacturingorminingenterpriseemploysexpertengineersandchemists,notonlytotestandcontroltheoperationofexistingprocesses,buttoinventnewandcheaperwaysofcarryingoutaprocess,todiscovernewproductsandnewusesforby-products。Itemploysexpertaccountantstooverhaulitsbook-keepingandfinanceandtosuggestimprovements。Initiativeandeconomyaretobestudied,evokedandappliedalongeverypath。 §;2。Butuntillatelythedetailedorganisationoflabouranditsutilisationforparticulartechnicalprocesseshadreceivedlittleattentioninthegreatroutineindustries。Evensuchtechnicalinstructionashasbeengiventobeginnersinsuchtradesasbuilding,engineering,weaving,shoemaking,etc。,hasusuallytakenforgrantedtheexistingtools,theacceptedmethodsofusingthemandthematerialtowhichtheyareapplied。 Tomakeeachsortofjobthesubject-matterofacloseanalysisandofelaborateexperiment,soastoascertainhowitcouldbedonemostquicklyandaccuratelyandwiththeleastexpenditureofneedlessenergy,comesasanovelcontributionofbusinessenterprise。TogettherightmantousetherighttoolsintherightwayisafairaccountoftheobjectofScientificManagement。Atpresentamanentersaparticulartradepartlybyuninstructedchoice,partlybychance,seldombecauseheisknownbyhimselfandhisemployertohaveanaturaloracquiredaptitudeforit。 Hehandlesthetoolsthataretraditionalandareingeneraluse,copyingthewaysinwhichothersusethem,receivingchancetipsorsuggestionsfromacomradeoraforeman,andlearningfrompersonalexperiencehowtodotheparticularworkinawaywhichappearstobeleasttroublesome,dangerous,orexhausting。Bothmodeofworkandpacearethoseofprevailingusage,moreorlessaffectedbymachineryorothertechnicalconditions。 Thescientificmanagerdiscoversenormouswastesinthiswayofworking。 Partofthewastehefindsduetoimpropertoolsandimpropermodesofworking,arisingfrommereignorance;partheattributestosystematicorhabitualslacking,moreorlessconsciousandintentionalonthepartoftheworkers。Thenaturaldispositionoftheworkerto\"takeiteasy\"