第4章
类别:
其他
作者:
佚名字数:30397更新时间:18/12/20 11:08:59
14
Thesedistinctionshavingbeendrawn,itisevidentthateverychangeandeverythingthatmovesisintime;forthedistinctionoffasterandslowerexistsinreferencetoallchange,sinceitisfoundineveryinstance。Inthephrase\'movingfaster\'Irefertothatwhichchangesbeforeanotherintotheconditioninquestion,whenitmovesoverthesameintervalandwitharegularmovement;e。g。inthecaseoflocomotion,ifboththingsmovealongthecircumferenceofacircle,orbothalongastraightline;andsimilarlyinallothercases。Butwhatisbeforeisintime;forwesay\'before\'and\'after\'withreferencetothedistancefromthe\'now\',andthe\'now\'
istheboundaryofthepastandthefuture;sothatsince\'nows\'areintime,thebeforeandtheafterwillbeintimetoo;forinthatinwhichthe\'now\'is,thedistancefromthe\'now\'willalsobe。But\'before\'isusedcontrariwisewithreferencetopastandtofuturetime;forinthepastwecall\'before\'whatisfartherfromthe\'now\',and\'after\'whatisnearer,butinthefuturewecallthenearer\'before\'andthefarther\'after\'。Sothatsincethe\'before\'isintime,andeverymovementinvolvesa\'before\',evidentlyeverychangeandeverymovementisintime。
Itisalsoworthconsideringhowtimecanberelatedtothesoul;
andwhytimeisthoughttobeineverything,bothinearthandinseaandinheaven。Isbecauseitisanattribute,orstate,ormovement(sinceitisthenumberofmovement)andallthesethingsaremovable(fortheyareallinplace),andtimeandmovementaretogether,bothinrespectofpotentialityandinrespectofactuality?
Whetherifsouldidnotexisttimewouldexistornot,isaquestionthatmayfairlybeasked;foriftherecannotbesomeonetocounttherecannotbeanythingthatcanbecounted,sothatevidentlytherecannotbenumber;fornumberiseitherwhathasbeen,orwhatcanbe,counted。Butifnothingbutsoul,orinsoulreason,isqualifiedtocount,therewouldnotbetimeunlessthereweresoul,butonlythatofwhichtimeisanattribute,i。e。ifmovementcanexistwithoutsoul,andthebeforeandafterareattributesofmovement,andtimeisthesequanumerable。
Onemightalsoraisethequestionwhatsortofmovementtimeisthenumberof。Mustwenotsay\'ofanykind\'?Forthingsbothcomeintobeingintimeandpassaway,andgrow,andarealteredintime,andaremovedlocally;thusitisofeachmovementquamovementthattimeisthenumber。Andsoitissimplythenumberofcontinuousmovement,notofanyparticularkindofit。
Butotherthingsaswellmayhavebeenmovednow,andtherewouldbeanumberofeachofthetwomovements。Isthereanothertime,then,andwilltherebetwoequaltimesatonce?Surelynot。Foratimethatisbothequalandsimultaneousisoneandthesametime,andeventhosethatarenotsimultaneousareoneinkind;forifthereweredogs,andhorses,andsevenofeach,itwouldbethesamenumber。
So,too,movementsthathavesimultaneouslimitshavethesametime,yettheonemayinfactbefastandtheothernot,andonemaybelocomotionandtheotheralteration;stillthetimeofthetwochangesisthesameiftheirnumberalsoisequalandsimultaneous;andforthisreason,whilethemovementsaredifferentandseparate,thetimeiseverywherethesame,becausethenumberofequalandsimultaneousmovementsiseverywhereoneandthesame。
Nowthereissuchathingaslocomotion,andinlocomotionthereisincludedcircularmovement,andeverythingismeasuredbysomeonethinghomogeneouswithit,unitsbyaunit,horsesbyahorse,andsimilarlytimesbysomedefinitetime,and,aswesaid,timeismeasuredbymotionaswellasmotionbytime(thisbeingsobecausebyamotiondefiniteintimethequantitybothofthemotionandofthetimeismeasured):if,then,whatisfirstisthemeasureofeverythinghomogeneouswithit,regularcircularmotionisaboveallelsethemeasure,becausethenumberofthisisthebestknown。Nowneitheralterationnorincreasenorcomingintobeingcanberegular,butlocomotioncanbe。Thisalsoiswhytimeisthoughttobethemovementofthesphere,viz。becausetheothermovementsaremeasuredbythis,andtimebythismovement。
Thisalsoexplainsthecommonsayingthathumanaffairsformacircle,andthatthereisacircleinallotherthingsthathaveanaturalmovementandcomingintobeingandpassingaway。Thisisbecauseallotherthingsarediscriminatedbytime,andendandbeginasthoughconformingtoacycle;foreventimeitselfisthoughttobeacircle。Andthisopinionagainisheldbecausetimeisthemeasureofthiskindoflocomotionandisitselfmeasuredbysuch。
Sothattosaythatthethingsthatcomeintobeingformacircleistosaythatthereisacircleoftime;andthisistosaythatitismeasuredbythecircularmovement;forapartfromthemeasurenothingelsetobemeasuredisobserved;thewholeisjustapluralityofmeasures。
Itissaidrightly,too,thatthenumberofthesheepandofthedogsisthesamenumberifthetwonumbersareequal,butnotthesamedecadorthesameten;justastheequilateralandthescalenearenotthesametriangle,yettheyarethesamefigure,becausetheyarebothtriangles。Forthingsarecalledthesameso-and-soiftheydonotdifferbyadifferentiaofthatthing,butnotiftheydo;e。g。
trianglediffersfromtrianglebyadifferentiaoftriangle,thereforetheyaredifferenttriangles;buttheydonotdifferbyadifferentiaoffigure,butareinoneandthesamedivisionofit。Forafigureoftheonekindisacircleandafigureofanotherkindoftriangle,andatriangleofonekindisequilateralandatriangleofanotherkindscalene。Theyarethesamefigure,then,that,triangle,butnotthesametriangle。Thereforethenumberoftwogroupsalso-isthesamenumber(fortheirnumberdoesnotdifferbyadifferentiaofnumber),butitisnotthesamedecad;forthethingsofwhichitisasserteddiffer;onegrouparedogs,andtheotherhorses。
Wehavenowdiscussedtime-bothtimeitselfandthemattersappropriatetotheconsiderationofit。
BookV
1
EVERYTHINGwhichchangesdoessoinoneofthreesenses。Itmaychange(1)accidentally,asforinstancewhenwesaythatsomethingmusicalwalks,thatwhichwalksbeingsomethinginwhichaptitudeformusicisanaccident。Again(2)athingissaidwithoutqualificationtochangebecausesomethingbelongingtoitchanges,i。e。instatementswhichrefertopartofthethinginquestion:
thusthebodyisrestoredtohealthbecausetheeyeorthechest,thatistosayapartofthewholebody,isrestoredtohealth。Andaboveallthereis(3)thecaseofathingwhichisinmotionneitheraccidentallynorinrespectofsomethingelsebelongingtoit,butinvirtueofbeingitselfdirectlyinmotion。Herewehaveathingwhichisessentiallymovable:andthatwhichissoisadifferentthingaccordingtotheparticularvarietyofmotion:forinstanceitmaybeathingcapableofalteration:andwithinthesphereofalterationitisagainadifferentthingaccordingasitiscapableofbeingrestoredtohealthorcapableofbeingheated。Andtherearethesamedistinctionsinthecaseofthemover:(1)onethingcausesmotionaccidentally,(2)anotherpartially(becausesomethingbelongingtoitcausesmotion),(3)anotherofitselfdirectly,as,forinstance,thephysicianheals,thehandstrikes。Wehave,then,thefollowingfactors:(a)ontheonehandthatwhichdirectlycausesmotion,and(b)ontheotherhandthatwhichisinmotion:
further,wehave(c)thatinwhichmotiontakesplace,namelytime,and(distinctfromthesethree)(d)thatfromwhichand(e)thattowhichitproceeds:foreverymotionproceedsfromsomethingandtosomething,thatwhichisdirectlyinmotionbeingdistinctfromthattowhichitisinmotionandthatfromwhichitisinmotion:forinstance,wemaytakethethreethings\'wood\',\'hot\',and\'cold\',ofwhichthefirstisthatwhichisinmotion,thesecondisthattowhichthemotionproceeds,andthethirdisthatfromwhichitproceeds。Thisbeingso,itisclearthatthemotionisinthewood,notinitsform:forthemotionisneithercausednorexperiencedbytheformortheplaceorthequantity。Soweareleftwithamover,amoved,andagoalofmotion。Idonotincludethestarting-pointofmotion:foritisthegoalratherthanthestarting-pointofmotionthatgivesitsnametoaparticularprocessofchange。Thus\'perishing\'ischangetonot-being,thoughitisalsotruethatthatthatwhichperisheschangesfrombeing:and\'becoming\'ischangetobeing,thoughitisalsochangefromnot-being。
Nowadefinitionofmotionhasbeengivenabove,fromwhichitwillbeseenthateverygoalofmotion,whetheritbeaform,anaffection,oraplace,isimmovable,as,forinstance,knowledgeandheat。Here,however,adifficultymayberaised。Affections,itmaybesaid,aremotions,andwhitenessisanaffection:thustheremaybechangetoamotion。Tothiswemayreplythatitisnotwhitenessbutwhiteningthatisamotion。Herealsothesamedistinctionsaretobeobserved:agoalofmotionmaybesoaccidentally,orpartiallyandwithreferencetosomethingotherthanitself,ordirectlyandwithnoreferencetoanythingelse:forinstance,athingwhichisbecomingwhitechangesaccidentallytoanobjectofthought,thecolourbeingonlyaccidentallytheobjectofthought;itchangestocolour,becausewhiteisapartofcolour,ortoEurope,becauseAthensisapartofEurope;butitchangesessentiallytowhitecolour。Itisnowclearinwhatsenseathingisinmotionessentially,accidentally,orinrespectofsomethingotherthanitself,andinwhatsensethephrase\'itselfdirectly\'isusedinthecasebothofthemoverandofthemoved:anditisalsoclearthatthemotionisnotintheformbutinthatwhichisinmotion,thatistosay\'themovableinactivity\'。Nowaccidentalchangewemayleaveoutofaccount:foritistobefoundineverything,atanytime,andinanyrespect。
Changewhichisnotaccidentalontheotherhandisnottobefoundineverything,butonlyincontraries,inthingsintermediatecontraries,andincontradictories,asmaybeprovedbyinduction。Anintermediatemaybeastarting-pointofchange,sinceforthepurposesofthechangeitservesascontrarytoeitheroftwocontraries:fortheintermediateisinasensetheextremes。Hencewespeakoftheintermediateasinasenseacontraryrelativelytotheextremesandofeitherextremeasacontraryrelativelytotheintermediate:forinstance,thecentralnoteislowrelatively-tothehighestandhighrelativelytothelowest,andgreyislightrelativelytoblackanddarkrelativelytowhite。
Andsinceeverychangeisfromsomethingtosomething-astheworditself(metabole)indicates,implyingsomething\'after\'(meta)
somethingelse,thatistosaysomethingearlierandsomethinglater-thatwhichchangesmustchangeinoneoffourways:fromsubjecttosubject,fromsubjecttononsubject,fromnon-subjecttosubject,orfromnon-subjecttonon-subject,whereby\'subject\'Imeanwhatisaffirmativelyexpressed。Soitfollowsnecessarilyfromwhathasbeensaidabovethatthereareonlythreekindsofchange,thatfromsubjecttosubject,thatfromsubjecttonon-subject,andthatfromnon-subjecttosubject:forthefourthconceivablekind,thatfromnon-subjecttononsubject,isnotchange,asinthatcasethereisnooppositioneitherofcontrariesorofcontradictories。
Nowchangefromnon-subjecttosubject,therelationbeingthatofcontradiction,is\'comingtobe\'-\'unqualifiedcomingtobe\'whenthechangetakesplaceinanunqualifiedway,\'particularcomingtobe\'
whenthechangeischangeinaparticularcharacter:forinstance,achangefromnot-whitetowhiteisacomingtobeoftheparticularthing,white,whilechangefromunqualifiednot-beingtobeingiscomingtobeinanunqualifiedway,inrespectofwhichwesaythatathing\'comestobe\'withoutqualification,notthatit\'comestobe\'
someparticularthing。Changefromsubjecttonon-subjectis\'perishing\'-\'unqualifiedperishing\'whenthechangeisfrombeingtonot-being,\'particularperishing\'whenthechangeistotheoppositenegation,thedistinctionbeingthesameasthatmadeinthecaseofcomingtobe。
Nowtheexpression\'not-being\'isusedinseveralsenses:andtherecanbemotionneitherofthatwhich\'isnot\'inrespectoftheaffirmationornegationofapredicate,norofthatwhich\'isnot\'
inthesensethatitonlypotentially\'is\',thatistosaytheoppositeofthatwhichactually\'is\'inanunqualifiedsense:foralthoughthatwhichis\'not-white\'or\'not-good\'mayneverthelessheinmotionaccidentally(forexamplethatwhichis\'not-white\'mightbeaman),yetthatwhichiswithoutqualification\'not-so-and-so\'cannotinanysensebeinmotion:thereforeitisimpossibleforthatwhichisnottobeinmotion。Thisbeingso,itfollowsthat\'becoming\'
cannotbeamotion:foritisthatwhich\'isnot\'that\'becomes\'。
Forhowevertrueitmaybethatitaccidentally\'becomes\',itisneverthelesscorrecttosaythatitisthatwhich\'isnot\'thatinanunqualifiedsense\'becomes\'。Andsimilarlyitisimpossibleforthatwhich\'isnot\'tobeatrest。
Therearethesedifficulties,then,inthewayoftheassumptionthatthatwhich\'isnot\'canbeinmotion:anditmaybefurtherobjectedthat,whereaseverythingwhichisinmotionisinspace,thatwhich\'isnot\'isnotinspace:forthenitwouldbesomewhere。
So,too,\'perishing\'isnotamotion:foramotionhasforitscontraryeitheranothermotionorrest,whereas\'perishing\'isthecontraryof\'becoming\'。
Since,then,everymotionisakindofchange,andthereareonlythethreekindsofchangementionedabove,andsinceofthesethreethosewhichtaketheformof\'becoming\'and\'perishing\',thatistosaythosewhichimplyarelationofcontradiction,arenotmotions:itnecessarilyfollowsthatonlychangefromsubjecttosubjectismotion。Andeverysuchsubjectiseitheracontraryoranintermediate(foraprivationmaybeallowedtorankasacontrary)andcanbeaffirmativelyexpressed,asnaked,toothless,orblack。If,then,thecategoriesareseverallydistinguishedasBeing,Quality,Place,Time,Relation,Quantity,andActivityorPassivity,itnecessarilyfollowsthattherearethreekindsofmotion-qualitative,quantitative,andlocal。
2
InrespectofSubstancethereisnomotion,becauseSubstancehasnocontraryamongthingsthatare。NoristheremotioninrespectofRelation:foritmayhappenthatwhenonecorrelativechanges,theother,althoughthisdoesnotitselfchange,isnolongerapplicable,sothatinthesecasesthemotionisaccidental。NoristheremotioninrespectofAgentandPatient-infacttherecanneverbemotionofmoverandmoved,becausetherecannotbemotionofmotionorbecomingofbecomingoringeneralchangeofchange。
Forinthefirstplacetherearetwosensesinwhichmotionofmotionisconceivable。(1)Themotionofwhichthereismotionmightbeconceivedassubject;e。g。amanisinmotionbecausehechangesfromfairtodark。Canitbethatinthissensemotiongrowshotorcold,orchangesplace,orincreasesordecreases?Impossible:forchangeisnotasubject。Or(2)cantherebemotionofmotioninthesensethatsomeothersubjectchangesfromachangetoanothermodeofbeing,ase。g。amanchangesfromfallingilltogettingwell?Eventhisispossibleonlyinanaccidentalsense。For,whateverthesubjectmaybe,movementischangefromoneformtoanother。(Andthesameholdsgoodofbecomingandperishing,exceptthatintheseprocesseswehaveachangetoaparticularkindofopposite,whiletheother,motion,isachangetoadifferentkind。)So,ifthereistobemotionofmotion,thatwhichischangingfromhealthtosicknessmustsimultaneouslybechangingfromthisverychangetoanother。Itisclear,then,thatbythetimethatithasbecomesick,itmustalsohavechangedtowhatevermaybetheotherchangeconcerned(forthatitshouldbeatrest,thoughlogicallypossible,isexcludedbythetheory)。Moreoverthisothercanneverbeanycasualchange,butmustbeachangefromsomethingdefinitetosomeotherdefinitething。
Sointhiscaseitmustbetheoppositechange,viz。convalescence。Itisonlyaccidentallythattherecanbechangeofchange,e。g。thereisachangefromrememberingtoforgettingonlybecausethesubjectofthischangechangesatonetimetoknowledge,atanothertoignorance。
Inthesecondplace,ifthereistobechangeofchangeandbecomingofbecoming,weshallhaveaninfiniteregress。Thusifoneofaseriesofchangesistobeachangeofchange,theprecedingchangemustalsobeso:e。g。ifsimplebecomingwaseverinprocessofbecoming,thenthatwhichwasbecomingsimplebecomingwasalsoinprocessofbecoming,sothatweshouldnotyethavearrivedatwhatwasinprocessofsimplebecomingbutonlyatwhatwasalreadyinprocessofbecominginprocessofbecoming。Andthisagainwassometimeinprocessofbecoming,sothateventhenweshouldnothavearrivedatwhatwasinprocessofsimplebecoming。Andsinceinaninfiniteseriesthereisnofirstterm,heretherewillbenofirststageandthereforenofollowingstageeither。Onthishypothesis,then,nothingcanbecomeorbemovedorchange。
Thirdly,ifathingiscapableofanyparticularmotion,itisalsocapableofthecorrespondingcontrarymotionorthecorrespondingcomingtorest,andathingthatiscapableofbecomingisalsocapableofperishing:consequently,iftherebebecomingofbecoming,thatwhichisinprocessofbecomingisinprocessofperishingattheverymomentwhenithasreachedthestageofbecoming:sinceitcannotbeinprocessofperishingwhenitisjustbeginningtobecomeorafterithasceasedtobecome:forthatwhichisinprocessofperishingmustbeinexistence。
Fourthly,theremustbeasubstrateunderlyingallprocessesofbecomingandchanging。Whatcanthisbeinthepresentcase?Itiseitherthebodyorthesoulthatundergoesalteration:whatisitthatcorrespondinglybecomesmotionorbecoming?Andagainwhatisthegoaloftheirmotion?Itmustbethemotionorbecomingofsomethingfromsomethingtosomethingelse。Butinwhatsensecanthisbeso?Forthebecomingoflearningcannotbelearning:soneithercanthebecomingofbecomingbebecoming,norcanthebecomingofanyprocessbethatprocess。
Finally,sincetherearethreekindsofmotion,thesubstratumandthegoalofmotionmustbeoneorotherofthese,e。g。locomotionwillhavetobealteredortobelocallymoved。
Tosumup,then,sinceeverythingthatismovedismovedinoneofthreeways,eitheraccidentally,orpartially,oressentially,changecanchangeonlyaccidentally,ase。g。whenamanwhoisbeingrestoredtohealthrunsorlearns:andaccidentalchangewehavelongagodecidedtoleaveoutofaccount。
Since,then,motioncanbelongneithertoBeingnortoRelationnortoAgentandPatient,itremainsthattherecanbemotiononlyinrespectofQuality,Quantity,andPlace:forwitheachofthesewehaveapairofcontraries。MotioninrespectofQualityletuscallalteration,ageneraldesignationthatisusedtoincludebothcontraries:andbyQualityIdonotheremeanapropertyofsubstance(inthatsensethatwhichconstitutesaspecificdistinctionisaquality)butapassivequalityinvirtueofwhichathingissaidtobeactedonortobeincapableofbeingactedon。MotioninrespectofQuantityhasnonamethatincludesbothcontraries,butitiscalledincreaseordecreaseaccordingasoneortheotherisdesignated:thatistosaymotioninthedirectionofcompletemagnitudeisincrease,motioninthecontrarydirectionisdecrease。
MotioninrespectofPlacehasnonameeithergeneralorparticular:
butwemaydesignateitbythegeneralnameoflocomotion,thoughstrictlytheterm\'locomotion\'isapplicabletothingsthatchangetheirplaceonlywhentheyhavenotthepowertocometoastand,andtothingsthatdonotmovethemselveslocally。
Changewithinthesamekindfromalessertoagreaterorfromagreatertoalesserdegreeisalteration:foritismotioneitherfromacontraryortoacontrary,whetherinanunqualifiedorinaqualifiedsense:forchangetoalesserdegreeofaqualitywillbecalledchangetothecontraryofthatquality,andchangetoagreaterdegreeofaqualitywillberegardedaschangefromthecontraryofthatqualitytothequalityitself。Itmakesnodifferencewhetherthechangebequalifiedorunqualified,exceptthatintheformercasethecontrarieswillhavetobecontrarytooneanotheronlyinaqualifiedsense:andathing\'spossessingaqualityinagreaterorinalesserdegreemeansthepresenceorabsenceinitofmoreorlessoftheoppositequality。Itisnowclear,then,thatthereareonlythesethreekindsofmotion。
Theterm\'immovable\'weapplyinthefirstplacetothatwhichisabsolutelyincapableofbeingmoved(justaswecorrespondinglyapplytheterminvisibletosound);inthesecondplacetothatwhichismovedwithdifficultyafteralongtimeorwhosemovementisslowatthestart-infact,whatwedescribeashardtomove;andinthethirdplacetothatwhichisnaturallydesignedforandcapableofmotion,butisnotinmotionwhen,where,andasitnaturallywouldbeso。ThislastistheonlykindofimmovablethingofwhichIusetheterm\'beingatrest\':forrestiscontrarytomotion,sothatrestwillbenegationofmotioninthatwhichiscapableofadmittingmotion。
Theforegoingremarksaresufficienttoexplaintheessentialnatureofmotionandrest,thenumberofkindsofchange,andthedifferentvarietiesofmotion。
3
Letusnowproceedtodefinetheterms\'together\'and\'apart\',\'incontact\',\'between\',\'insuccession\',\'contiguous\',and\'continuous\',andtoshowinwhatcircumstanceseachofthesetermsisnaturallyapplicable。
Thingsaresaidtobetogetherinplacewhentheyareinoneplace(inthestrictestsenseoftheword\'place\')andtobeapartwhentheyareindifferentplaces。
Thingsaresaidtobeincontactwhentheirextremitiesaretogether。
Thatwhichachangingthing,ifitchangescontinuouslyinanaturalmanner,naturallyreachesbeforeitreachesthattowhichitchangeslast,isbetween。Thus\'between\'impliesthepresenceofatleastthreethings:forinaprocessofchangeitisthecontrarythatis\'last\':andathingismovedcontinuouslyifitleavesnogaporonlythesmallestpossiblegapinthematerial-notinthetime(foragapinthetimedoesnotpreventthingshavinga\'between\',while,ontheotherhand,thereisnothingtopreventthehighestnotesoundingimmediatelyafterthelowest)butinthematerialinwhichthemotiontakesplace。Thisismanifestlytruenotonlyinlocalchangesbutineveryotherkindaswell。(Noweverychangeimpliesapairofopposites,andoppositesmaybeeithercontrariesorcontradictories;sincethencontradictionadmitsofnomeanterm,itisobviousthat\'between\'mustimplyapairofcontraries)Thatislocallycontrarywhichismostdistantinastraightline:fortheshortestlineisdefinitelylimited,andthatwhichisdefinitelylimitedconstitutesameasure。
Athingis\'insuccession\'whenitisafterthebeginninginpositionorinformorinsomeotherrespectinwhichitisdefinitelysoregarded,andwhenfurtherthereisnothingofthesamekindasitselfbetweenitandthattowhichitisinsuccession,e。g。alineorlinesifitisaline,aunitorunitsifitisaunit,ahouseifitisahouse(thereisnothingtopreventsomethingofadifferentkindbeingbetween)。Forthatwhichisinsuccessionisinsuccessiontoaparticularthing,andissomethingposterior:foroneisnot\'insuccession\'totwo,noristhefirstdayofthemonthtobesecond:ineachcasethelatteris\'insuccession\'totheformer。
Athingthatisinsuccessionandtouchesis\'contiguous\'。The\'continuous\'isasubdivisionofthecontiguous:thingsarecalledcontinuouswhenthetouchinglimitsofeachbecomeoneandthesameandare,asthewordimplies,containedineachother:continuityisimpossibleiftheseextremitiesaretwo。Thisdefinitionmakesitplainthatcontinuitybelongstothingsthatnaturallyinvirtueoftheirmutualcontactformaunity。Andinwhateverwaythatwhichholdsthemtogetherisone,sotoowillthewholebeone,e。g。byarivetorglueorcontactororganicunion。
Itisobviousthatoftheseterms\'insuccession\'isfirstinorderofanalysis:forthatwhichtouchesisnecessarilyinsuccession,butnoteverythingthatisinsuccessiontouches:andsosuccessionisapropertyofthingspriorindefinition,e。g。
numbers,whilecontactisnot。Andifthereiscontinuitythereisnecessarilycontact,butifthereiscontact,thatalonedoesnotimplycontinuity:fortheextremitiesofthingsmaybe\'together\'
withoutnecessarilybeingone:buttheycannotbeonewithoutbeingnecessarilytogether。Sonaturaljunctionislastincomingtobe:fortheextremitiesmustnecessarilycomeintocontactiftheyaretobenaturallyjoined:butthingsthatareincontactarenotallnaturallyjoined,whilethereisnocontactclearlythereisnonaturaljunctioneither。Hence,ifassomesay\'point\'and\'unit\'haveanindependentexistenceoftheirown,itisimpossibleforthetwotobeidentical:forpointscantouchwhileunitscanonlybeinsuccession。
Moreover,therecanalwaysbesomethingbetweenpoints(foralllinesareintermediatebetweenpoints),whereasitisnotnecessarythatthereshouldpossiblybeanythingbetweenunits:fortherecanbenothingbetweenthenumbersoneandtwo。
Wehavenowdefinedwhatismeantby\'together\'and\'apart\',\'contact\',\'between\'and\'insuccession\',\'contiguous\'and\'continuous\':andwehaveshowninwhatcircumstanceseachofthesetermsisapplicable。
4
Therearemanysensesinwhichmotionissaidtobe\'one\':forweusetheterm\'one\'inmanysenses。
Motionisonegenericallyaccordingtothedifferentcategoriestowhichitmaybeassigned:thusanylocomotionisonegenericallywithanyotherlocomotion,whereasalterationisdifferentgenericallyfromlocomotion。
Motionisonespecificallywhenbesidesbeingonegenericallyitalsotakesplaceinaspeciesincapableofsubdivision:e。g。colourhasspecificdifferences:thereforeblackeningandwhiteningdifferspecifically;butatalleventseverywhiteningwillbespecificallythesamewitheveryotherwhiteningandeveryblackeningwitheveryotherblackening。Butwhiteisnotfurthersubdividedbyspecificdifferences:henceanywhiteningisspecificallyonewithanyotherwhitening。Whereithappensthatthegenusisatthesametimeaspecies,itisclearthatthemotionwilltheninasensebeonespecificallythoughnotinanunqualifiedsense:learningisanexampleofthis,knowledgebeingontheonehandaspeciesofapprehensionandontheotherhandagenusincludingthevariousknowledges。Adifficulty,however,mayberaisedastowhetheramotionisspecificallyonewhenthesamethingchangesfromthesametothesame,e。g。whenonepointchangesagainandagainfromaparticularplacetoaparticularplace:ifthismotionisspecificallyone,circularmotionwillbethesameasrectilinearmotion,androllingthesameaswalking。Butisnotthisdifficultyremovedbytheprinciplealreadylaiddownthatifthatinwhichthemotiontakesplaceisspecificallydifferent(asinthepresentinstancethecircularpathisspecificallydifferentfromthestraight)themotionitselfisalsodifferent?Wehaveexplained,then,whatismeantbysayingthatmotionisonegenericallyoronespecifically。
Motionisoneinanunqualifiedsensewhenitisoneessentiallyornumerically:andthefollowingdistinctionswillmakeclearwhatthiskindofmotionis。Therearethreeclassesofthingsinconnexionwithwhichwespeakofmotion,the\'thatwhich\',the\'thatinwhich\',andthe\'thatduringwhich\'。Imeanthattheremusthesomethingthatisinmotion,e。g。amanorgold,anditmustbeinmotioninsomething,e。g。aplaceoranaffection,andduringsomething,forallmotiontakesplaceduringatime。Ofthesethreeitisthethinginwhichthemotiontakesplacethatmakesitonegenericallyorspecifically,itisthethingmovedthatmakesthemotiononeinsubject,anditisthetimethatmakesitconsecutive:
butitisthethreetogetherthatmakeitonewithoutqualification:
toeffectthis,thatinwhichthemotiontakesplace(thespecies)
mustbeoneandincapableofsubdivision,thatduringwhichittakesplace(thetime)mustbeoneandunintermittent,andthatwhichisinmotionmustbeone-notinanaccidentalsense(i。e。itmustbeoneasthewhitethatblackensisoneorCoriscuswhowalksisone,notintheaccidentalsenseinwhichCoriscusandwhitemaybeone),normerelyinvirtueofcommunityofnature(fortheremightbeacaseoftwomenbeingrestoredtohealthatthesametimeinthesameway,e。g。frominflammationoftheeye,yetthismotionisnotreallyone,butonlyspecificallyone)。
Suppose,however,thatSocratesundergoesanalterationspecificallythesamebutatonetimeandagainatanother:inthiscaseifitispossibleforthatwhichceasedtobeagaintocomeintobeingandremainnumericallythesame,thenthismotiontoowillbeone:
otherwiseitwillbethesamebutnotone。Andakintothisdifficultythereisanother;viz。ishealthone?andgenerallyarethestatesandaffectionsinbodiesseverallyoneinessencealthough(asisclear)
thethingsthatcontainthemareobviouslyinmotionandinflux?Thusifaperson\'shealthatdaybreakandatthepresentmomentisoneandthesame,whyshouldnotthishealthbenumericallyonewiththatwhichherecoversafteraninterval?Thesameargumentappliesineachcase。Thereis,however,wemayanswer,thisdifference:thatifthestatesaretwothenitfollowssimplyfromthisfactthattheactivitiesmustalsoinpointofnumberbetwo(foronlythatwhichisnumericallyonecangiverisetoanactivitythatisnumericallyone),butifthestateisone,thisisnotinitselfenoughtomakeusregardtheactivityalsoasone:forwhenamanceaseswalking,thewalkingnolongeris,butitwillagainbeifhebeginstowalkagain。
But,bethisasitmay,ifintheaboveinstancethehealthisoneandthesame,thenitmustbepossibleforthatwhichisoneandthesametocometobeandtoceasetobemanytimes。However,thesedifficultieslieoutsideourpresentinquiry。
Sinceeverymotioniscontinuous,amotionthatisoneinanunqualifiedsensemust(sinceeverymotionisdivisible)becontinuous,andacontinuousmotionmustbeone。Therewillnotbecontinuitybetweenanymotionandanyotherindiscriminatelyanymorethanthereisbetweenanytwothingschosenatrandominanyothersphere:therecanbecontinuityonlywhentheextremitiesofthetwothingsareone。Nowsomethingshavenoextremitiesatall:andtheextremitiesofothersdifferspecificallyalthoughwegivethemthesamenameof\'end\':howshoulde。g。the\'end\'ofalineandthe\'end\'ofwalkingtouchorcometobeone?Motionsthatarenotthesameeitherspecificallyorgenericallymay,itistrue,beconsecutive(e。g。amanmayrunandthenatoncefallillofafever),andagain,inthetorch-racewehaveconsecutivebutnotcontinuouslocomotion:foraccordingtoourdefinitiontherecanbecontinuityonlywhentheendsofthetwothingsareone。Hencemotionsmaybeconsecutiveorsuccessiveinvirtueofthetimebeingcontinuous,buttherecanbecontinuityonlyinvirtueofthemotionsthemselvesbeingcontinuous,thatiswhentheendofeachisonewiththeendoftheother。Motion,therefore,thatisinanunqualifiedsensecontinuousandonemustbespecificallythesame,ofonething,andinonetime。Unityisrequiredinrespectoftimeinorderthattheremaybenointervalofimmobility,forwherethereisintermissionofmotiontheremustberest,andamotionthatincludesintervalsofrestwillbenotonebutmany,sothatamotionthatisinterruptedbystationarinessisnotoneorcontinuous,anditissointerruptedifthereisanintervaloftime。Andthoughofamotionthatisnotspecificallyone(evenifthetimeisunintermittent)thetimeisone,themotionisspecificallydifferent,andsocannotreallybeone,formotionthatisonemustbespecificallyone,thoughmotionthatisspecificallyoneisnotnecessarilyoneinanunqualifiedsense。Wehavenowexplainedwhatwemeanwhenwecallamotiononewithoutqualification。
Further,amotionisalsosaidtobeonegenerically,specifically,oressentiallywhenitiscomplete,justasinothercasescompletenessandwholenessarecharacteristicsofwhatisone:
andsometimesamotionevenifincompleteissaidtobeone,providedonlythatitiscontinuous。
Andbesidesthecasesalreadymentionedthereisanotherinwhichamotionissaidtobeone,viz。whenitisregular:forinasenseamotionthatisirregularisnotregardedasone,thattitlebelongingrathertothatwhichisregular,asastraightlineisregular,theirregularbeingassuchdivisible。Butthedifferencewouldseemtobeoneofdegree。Ineverykindofmotionwemayhaveregularityorirregularity:thustheremayberegularalteration,andlocomotioninaregularpath,e。g。inacircleoronastraightline,anditisthesamewithregardtoincreaseanddecrease。Thedifferencethatmakesamotionirregularissometimestobefoundinitspath:thusamotioncannotberegularifitspathisanirregularmagnitude,e。g。abrokenline,aspiral,oranyothermagnitudethatisnotsuchthatanypartofittakenatrandomfitsontoanyotherthatmaybechosen。Sometimesitisfoundneitherintheplacenorinthetimenorinthegoalbutinthemannerofthemotion:forinsomecasesthemotionisdifferentiatedbyquicknessandslowness:thusifitsvelocityisuniformamotionisregular,ifnotitisirregular。Soquicknessandslownessarenotspeciesofmotionnordotheyconstitutespecificdifferencesofmotion,becausethisdistinctionoccursinconnexionwithallthedistinctspeciesofmotion。Thesameistrueofheavinessandlightnesswhentheyrefertothesamething:e。g。theydonotspecificallydistinguishearthfromitselforfirefromitself。Irregularmotion,therefore,whileinvirtueofbeingcontinuousitisone,issoinalesserdegree,asisthecasewithlocomotioninabrokenline:andalesserdegreeofsomethingalwaysmeansanadmixtureofitscontrary。Andsinceeverymotionthatisonecanbebothregularandirregular,motionsthatareconsecutivebutnotspecificallythesamecannotbeoneandcontinuous:forhowshouldamotioncomposedofalterationandlocomotionberegular?Ifamotionistoberegularitspartsoughttofitoneanother。
5
Wehavefurthertodeterminewhatmotionsarecontrarytoeachother,andtodeterminesimilarlyhowitiswithrest。Andwehavefirsttodecidewhethercontrarymotionsaremotionsrespectivelyfromandtothesamething,e。g。amotionfromhealthandamotiontohealth(wheretheopposition,itwouldseem,isofthesamekindasthatbetweencomingtobeandceasingtobe);ormotionsrespectivelyfromcontraries,e。g。amotionfromhealthandamotionfromdisease;ormotionsrespectivelytocontraries,e。g。amotiontohealthandamotiontodisease;ormotionsrespectivelyfromacontraryandtotheoppositecontrary,e。g。amotionfromhealthandamotiontodisease;ormotionsrespectivelyfromacontrarytotheoppositecontraryandfromthelattertotheformer,e。g。amotionfromhealthtodiseaseandamotionfromdiseasetohealth:formotionsmustbecontrarytooneanotherinoneormoreoftheseways,asthereisnootherwayinwhichtheycanbeopposed。
Nowmotionsrespectivelyfromacontraryandtotheoppositecontrary,e。g。amotionfromhealthandamotiontodisease,arenotcontrarymotions:fortheyareoneandthesame。(Yettheiressenceisnotthesame,justaschangingfromhealthisdifferentfromchangingtodisease。)Noraremotionrespectivelyfromacontraryandfromtheoppositecontrarycontrarymotions,foramotionfromacontraryisatthesametimeamotiontoacontraryortoanintermediate(ofthis,however,weshallspeaklater),butchangingtoacontraryratherthanchangingfromacontrarywouldseemtobethecauseofthecontrarietyofmotions,thelatterbeingtheloss,theformerthegain,ofcontrariness。Moreover,eachseveralmotiontakesitsnameratherfromthegoalthanfromthestarting-pointofchange,e。g。motiontohealthwecallconvalescence,motiontodiseasesickening。Thusweareleftwithmotionsrespectivelytocontraries,andmotionsrespectivelytocontrariesfromtheoppositecontraries。
Nowitwouldseemthatmotionstocontrariesareatthesametimemotionsfromcontraries(thoughtheiressencemaynotbethesame;\'tohealth\'isdistinct,Imean,from\'fromdisease\',and\'fromhealth\'
from\'todisease\')。
Sincethenchangediffersfrommotion(motionbeingchangefromaparticularsubjecttoaparticularsubject),itfollowsthatcontrarymotionsaremotionsrespectivelyfromacontrarytotheoppositecontraryandfromthelattertotheformer,e。g。amotionfromhealthtodiseaseandamotionfromdiseasetohealth。
Moreover,theconsiderationofparticularexampleswillalsoshowwhatkindsofprocessesaregenerallyrecognizedascontrary:thusfallingillisregardedascontrarytorecoveringone\'shealth,theseprocesseshavingcontrarygoals,andbeingtaughtascontrarytobeingledintoerrorbyanother,itbeingpossibletoacquireerror,likeknowledge,eitherbyone\'sownagencyorbythatofanother。
Similarlywehaveupwardlocomotionanddownwardlocomotion,whicharecontrarylengthwise,locomotiontotherightandlocomotiontotheleft,whicharecontrarybreadthwise,andforwardlocomotionandbackwardlocomotion,whichtooarecontraries。Ontheotherhand,aprocesssimplytoacontrary,e。g。thatdenotedbytheexpression\'becomingwhite\',wherenostarting-pointisspecified,isachangebutnotamotion。Andinallcasesofathingthathasnocontrarywehaveascontrarieschangefromandchangetothesamething。Thuscomingtobeiscontrarytoceasingtobe,andlosingtogaining。
Butthesearechangesandnotmotions。Andwhereverapairofcontrariesadmitofanintermediate,motionstothatintermediatemustbeheldtobeinasensemotionstooneorotherofthecontraries:
fortheintermediateservesasacontraryforthepurposesofthemotion,inwhicheverdirectionthechangemaybe,e。g。greyinamotionfromgreytowhitetakestheplaceofblackasstarting-point,inamotionfromwhitetogreyittakestheplaceofblackasgoal,andinamotionfromblacktogreyittakestheplaceofwhiteasgoal:forthemiddleisopposedinasensetoeitheroftheextremes,ashasbeensaidabove。Thusweseethattwomotionsarecontrarytoeachotheronlywhenoneisamotionfromacontrarytotheoppositecontraryandtheotherisamotionfromthelattertotheformer。
6
Butsinceamotionappearstohavecontrarytoitnotonlyanothermotionbutalsoastateofrest,wemustdeterminehowthisisso。A
motionhasforitscontraryinthestrictsenseofthetermanothermotion,butitalsohasforanoppositeastateofrest(forrestistheprivationofmotionandtheprivationofanythingmaybecalleditscontrary),andmotionofonekindhasforitsoppositerestofthatkind,e。g。localmotionhaslocalrest。Thisstatement,however,needsfurtherqualification:thereremainsthequestion,istheoppositeofremainingataparticularplacemotionfromormotiontothatplace?Itissurelyclearthatsincetherearetwosubjectsbetweenwhichmotiontakesplace,motionfromoneofthese(A)toitscontrary(B)hasforitsoppositeremaininginAwhilethereversemotionhasforitsoppositeremaininginB。Atthesametimethesetwoarealsocontrarytoeachother:foritwouldbeabsurdtosupposethattherearecontrarymotionsandnotoppositestatesofrest。Statesofrestincontrariesareopposed。Totakeanexample,astateofrestinhealthis(1)contrarytoastateofrestindisease,and(2)themotiontowhichitiscontraryisthatfromhealthtodisease。For(2)itwouldbeabsurdthatitscontrarymotionshouldbethatfromdiseasetohealth,sincemotiontothatinwhichathingisatrestisratheracomingtorest,thecomingtorestbeingfoundtocomeintobeingsimultaneouslywiththemotion;andoneofthesetwomotionsitmustbe。And(1)restinwhitenessisofcoursenotcontrarytorestinhealth。
Ofallthingsthathavenocontrariesthereareoppositechanges(viz。changefromthethingandchangetothething,e。g。changefrombeingandchangetobeing),butnomotion。So,too,ofsuchthingsthereisnoremainingthoughthereisabsenceofchange。Shouldtherebeaparticularsubject,absenceofchangeinitsbeingwillbecontrarytoabsenceofchangeinitsnot-being。Andhereadifficultymayberaised:ifnot-beingisnotaparticularsomething,whatisit,itmaybeasked,thatiscontrarytoabsenceofchangeinathing\'sbeing?andisthisabsenceofchangeastateofrest?Ifitis,theneitheritisnottruethateverystateofrestiscontrarytoamotionorelsecomingtobeandceasingtobearemotion。Itisclearthenthat,sinceweexcludethesefromamongmotions,wemustnotsaythatthisabsenceofchangeisastateofrest:wemustsaythatitissimilartoastateofrestandcallitabsenceofchange。Anditwillhaveforitscontraryeithernothingorabsenceofchangeinthething\'snot-being,ortheceasingtobeofthething:forsuchceasingtobeischangefromitandthething\'scomingtobeischangetoit。
Again,afurtherdifficultymayberaised。Howisit,itmaybeasked,thatwhereasinlocalchangebothremainingandmovingmaybenaturalorunnatural,intheotherchangesthisisnotso?e。g。
alterationisnotnownaturalandnowunnatural,forconvalescenceisnomorenaturalorunnaturalthanfallingill,whiteningnomorenaturalorunnaturalthanblackening;so,too,withincreaseanddecrease:thesearenotcontrarytoeachotherinthesensethateitherofthemisnaturalwhiletheotherisunnatural,norisoneincreasecontrarytoanotherinthissense;andthesameaccountmaybegivenofbecomingandperishing:itisnottruethatbecomingisnaturalandperishingunnatural(forgrowingoldisnatural),nordoweobserveonebecomingtobenaturalandanotherunnatural。Weanswerthatifwhathappensunderviolenceisunnatural,thenviolentperishingisunnaturalandassuchcontrarytonaturalperishing。
Aretherethenalsosomebecomingsthatareviolentandnottheresultofnaturalnecessity,andarethereforecontrarytonaturalbecomings,andviolentincreasesanddecreases,e。g。therapidgrowthtomaturityofprofligatesandtherapidripeningofseedsevenwhennotpackedcloseintheearth?Andhowisitwithalterations?Surelyjustthesame:wemaysaythatsomealterationsareviolentwhileothersarenatural,e。g。patientsalternaturallyorunnaturallyaccordingastheythrowofffeversonthecriticaldaysornot。But,itmaybeobjected,thenweshallhaveperishingscontrarytooneanother,nottobecoming。Certainly:andwhyshouldnotthisinasensebeso?Thusitissoifoneperishingispleasantandanotherpainful:andsooneperishingwillbecontrarytoanothernotinanunqualifiedsense,butinsofarasonehasthisqualityandtheotherthat。
Nowmotionsandstatesofrestuniversallyexhibitcontrarietyinthemannerdescribedabove,e。g。upwardmotionandrestabovearerespectivelycontrarytodownwardmotionandrestbelow,thesebeinginstancesoflocalcontrariety;andupwardlocomotionbelongsnaturallytofireanddownwardtoearth,i。e。thelocomotionsofthetwoarecontrarytoeachother。Andagain,firemovesupnaturallyanddownunnaturally:anditsnaturalmotioniscertainlycontrarytoitsunnaturalmotion。Similarlywithremaining:remainingaboveiscontrarytomotionfromabovedownwards,andtoearththisremainingcomesunnaturally,thismotionnaturally。Sotheunnaturalremainingofathingiscontrarytoitsnaturalmotion,justaswefindasimilarcontrarietyinthemotionofthesamething:oneofitsmotions,theupwardorthedownward,willbenatural,theotherunnatural。
Here,however,thequestionarises,haseverystateofrestthatisnotpermanentabecoming,andisthisbecomingacomingtoastandstill?Ifso,theremustbeabecomingofthatwhichisatrestunnaturally,e。g。ofearthatrestabove:andthereforethisearthduringthetimethatitwasbeingcarriedviolentlyupwardwascomingtoastandstill。Butwhereasthevelocityofthatwhichcomestoastandstillseemsalwaystoincrease,thevelocityofthatwhichiscarriedviolentlyseemsalwaystodecrease:soitwillheinastateofrestwithouthavingbecomeso。Moreover\'comingtoastandstill\'isgenerallyrecognizedtobeidenticaloratleastconcomitantwiththelocomotionofathingtoitsproperplace。
Thereisalsoanotherdifficultyinvolvedintheviewthatremaininginaparticularplaceiscontrarytomotionfromthatplace。Forwhenathingismovingfromordiscardingsomething,itstillappearstohavethatwhichisbeingdiscarded,sothatifastateofrestisitselfcontrarytothemotionfromthestateofresttoitscontrary,thecontrariesrestandmotionwillbesimultaneouslypredicableofthesamething。Maywenotsay,however,thatinsofarasthethingisstillstationaryitisinastateofrestinaqualifiedsense?For,infact,wheneverathingisinmotion,partofitisatthestarting-pointwhilepartisatthegoaltowhichitischanging:andconsequentlyamotionfindsitstruecontraryratherinanothermotionthaninastateofrest。
Withregardtomotionandrest,then,wehavenowexplainedinwhatsenseeachofthemisoneandunderwhatconditionstheyexhibitcontrariety。
[Withregardtocomingtoastandstillthequestionmayberaisedwhetherthereisanoppositestateofresttounnaturalaswellastonaturalmotions。Itwouldbeabsurdifthiswerenotthecase:
forathingmayremainstillmerelyunderviolence:thusweshallhaveathingbeinginanon-permanentstateofrestwithouthavingbecomeso。Butitisclearthatitmustbethecase:forjustasthereisunnaturalmotion,so,too,athingmaybeinanunnaturalstateofrest。Further,somethingshaveanaturalandanunnaturalmotion,e。g。firehasanaturalupwardmotionandanunnaturaldownwardmotion:isit,then,thisunnaturaldownwardmotionorisitthenaturaldownwardmotionofearththatiscontrarytothenaturalupwardmotion?Surelyitisclearthatbotharecontrarytoitthoughnotinthesamesense:thenaturalmotionofearthiscontraryinasmuchasthemotionoffireisalsonatural,whereastheupwardmotionoffireasbeingnaturaliscontrarytothedownwardmotionoffireasbeingunnatural。Thesameistrueofthecorrespondingcasesofremaining。Buttherewouldseemtobeasenseinwhichastateofrestandamotionareopposites。]
BookVI
1
Nowiftheterms\'continuous\',\'incontact\',and\'insuccession\'areunderstoodasdefinedabovethingsbeing\'continuous\'iftheirextremitiesareone,\'incontact\'iftheirextremitiesaretogether,and\'insuccession\'ifthereisnothingoftheirownkindintermediatebetweenthem-nothingthatiscontinuouscanbecomposed\'ofindivisibles\':e。g。alinecannotbecomposedofpoints,thelinebeingcontinuousandthepointindivisible。Fortheextremitiesoftwopointscanneitherbeone(sinceofanindivisibletherecanbenoextremityasdistinctfromsomeotherpart)nortogether(sincethatwhichhasnopartscanhavenoextremity,theextremityandthethingofwhichitistheextremitybeingdistinct)。
Moreover,ifthatwhichiscontinuousiscomposedofpoints,thesepointsmustbeeithercontinuousorincontactwithoneanother:andthesamereasoningappliesinthecaseofallindivisibles。Nowforthereasongivenabovetheycannotbecontinuous:andonethingcanbeincontactwithanotheronlyifwholeisincontactwithwholeorpartwithpartorpartwithwhole。Butsinceindivisibleshavenoparts,theymustbeincontactwithoneanotheraswholewithwhole。Andiftheyareincontactwithoneanotheraswholewithwhole,theywillnotbecontinuous:forthatwhichiscontinuoushasdistinctparts:
andthesepartsintowhichitisdivisiblearedifferentinthisway,i。e。spatiallyseparate。
Nor,again,canapointbeinsuccessiontoapointoramomenttoamomentinsuchawaythatlengthcanbecomposedofpointsortimeofmoments:forthingsareinsuccessionifthereisnothingoftheirownkindintermediatebetweenthem,whereasthatwhichisintermediatebetweenpointsisalwaysalineandthatwhichisintermediatebetweenmomentsisalwaysaperiodoftime。
Again,iflengthandtimecouldthusbecomposedofindivisibles,theycouldbedividedintoindivisibles,sinceeachisdivisibleintothepartsofwhichitiscomposed。But,aswesaw,nocontinuousthingisdivisibleintothingswithoutparts。Norcantherebeanythingofanyotherkindintermediatebetweenthepartsorbetweenthemoments:foriftherecouldbeanysuchthingitisclearthatitmustbeeitherindivisibleordivisible,andifitisdivisible,itmustbedivisibleeitherintoindivisiblesorintodivisiblesthatareinfinitelydivisible,inwhichcaseitiscontinuous。
Moreover,itisplainthateverythingcontinuousisdivisibleintodivisiblesthatareinfinitelydivisible:forifitweredivisibleintoindivisibles,weshouldhaveanindivisibleincontactwithanindivisible,sincetheextremitiesofthingsthatarecontinuouswithoneanotherareoneandareincontact。
Thesamereasoningappliesequallytomagnitude,totime,andtomotion:eitherallofthesearecomposedofindivisiblesandaredivisibleintoindivisibles,ornone。Thismaybemadeclearasfollows。Ifamagnitudeiscomposedofindivisibles,themotionoverthatmagnitudemustbecomposedofcorrespondingindivisiblemotions:e。g。ifthemagnitudeABGiscomposedoftheindivisiblesA,B,G,eachcorrespondingpartofthemotionDEZofOoverABGisindivisible。Therefore,sincewherethereismotiontheremustbesomethingthatisinmotion,andwherethereissomethinginmotiontheremustbemotion,thereforethebeing-movedwillalsobecomposedofindivisibles。SoOtraversedAwhenitsmotionwasD,B
whenitsmotionwasE,andGsimilarlywhenitsmotionwasZ。Nowathingthatisinmotionfromoneplacetoanothercannotatthemomentwhenitwasinmotionbothbeinmotionandatthesametimehavecompleteditsmotionattheplacetowhichitwasinmotion:e。g。ifamaniswalkingtoThebes,hecannotbewalkingtoThebesandatthesametimehavecompletedhiswalktoThebes:and,aswesaw,O
traversesathepartlesssectionAinvirtueofthepresenceofthemotionD。Consequently,ifOactuallypassedthroughAafterbeinginprocessofpassingthrough,themotionmustbedivisible:foratthetimewhenOwaspassingthrough,itneitherwasatrestnorhadcompleteditspassagebutwasinanintermediatestate:whileifitispassingthroughandhascompleteditspassageatthesamemoment,thenthatwhichiswalkingwillatthemomentwhenitiswalkinghavecompleteditswalkandwillbeintheplacetowhichitiswalking;
thatistosay,itwillhavecompleteditsmotionattheplacetowhichitisinmotion。AndifathingisinmotionoverthewholeKBGanditsmotionisthethreeD,E,andZ,andifitisnotinmotionatalloverthepartlesssectionAbuthascompleteditsmotionoverit,thenthemotionwillconsistnotofmotionsbutofstarts,andwilltakeplacebyathing\'shavingcompletedamotionwithoutbeinginmotion:foronthisassumptionithascompleteditspassagethroughAwithoutpassingthroughit。Soitwillbepossibleforathingtohavecompletedawalkwithouteverwalking:foronthisassumptionithascompletedawalkoveraparticulardistancewithoutwalkingoverthatdistance。Since,then,everythingmustbeeitheratrestorinmotion,andOisthereforeatrestineachofthesectionsA,B,andG,itfollowsthatathingcanbecontinuouslyatrestandatthesametimeinmotion:for,aswesaw,OisinmotionoverthewholeABGandatrestinanypart(andconsequentlyinthewhole)ofit。Moreover,iftheindivisiblescomposingDEZaremotions,itwouldbepossibleforathinginspiteofthepresenceinitofmotiontobenotinmotionbutatrest,whileiftheyarenotmotions,itwouldbepossibleformotiontobecomposedofsomethingotherthanmotions。
Andiflengthandmotionarethusindivisible,itisneithermorenorlessnecessarythattimealsobesimilarlyindivisible,thatistosaybecomposedofindivisiblemoments:forifthewholedistanceisdivisibleandanequalvelocitywillcauseathingtopassthroughlessofitinlesstime,thetimemustalsobedivisible,andconversely,ifthetimeinwhichathingiscarriedoverthesectionA
isdivisible,thissectionAmustalsobedivisible。
2
Andsinceeverymagnitudeisdivisibleintomagnitudes-forwehaveshownthatitisimpossibleforanythingcontinuoustobecomposedofindivisibleparts,andeverymagnitudeiscontinuous-itnecessarilyfollowsthatthequickeroftwothingstraversesagreatermagnitudeinanequaltime,anequalmagnitudeinlesstime,andagreatermagnitudeinlesstime,inconformitywiththedefinitionsometimesgivenof\'thequicker\'。SupposethatAisquickerthanB。Nowsinceoftwothingsthatwhichchangessoonerisquicker,inthetimeZH,inwhichAhaschangedfromGtoD,BwillnotyethavearrivedatD
butwillbeshortofit:sothatinanequaltimethequickerwillpassoveragreatermagnitude。Morethanthis,itwillpassoveragreatermagnitudeinlesstime:forinthetimeinwhichAhasarrivedatD,Bbeingtheslowerhasarrived,letussay,atE。ThensinceA
hasoccupiedthewholetimeZHinarrivingatD,willhavearrivedatOinlesstimethanthis,sayZK。NowthemagnitudeGOthatAhaspassedoverisgreaterthanthemagnitudeGE,andthetimeZKislessthanthewholetimeZH:sothatthequickerwillpassoveragreatermagnitudeinlesstime。Andfromthisitisalsoclearthatthequickerwillpassoveranequalmagnitudeinlesstimethantheslower。Forsinceitpassesoverthegreatermagnitudeinlesstimethantheslower,and(regardedbyitself)passesoverLMthegreaterinmoretimethanLXthelesser,thetimePRhinwhichitpassesoverLMwillbemorethanthetimePS,whichitpassesoverLX:sothat,thetimePRhbeinglessthanthetimePChinwhichtheslowerpassesoverLX,thetimePSwillalsobelessthanthetimePX:foritislessthanthetimePRh,andthatwhichislessthansomethingelsethatislessthanathingisalsoitselflessthanthatthing。
Henceitfollowsthatthequickerwilltraverseanequalmagnitudeinlesstimethantheslower。Again,sincethemotionofanythingmustalwaysoccupyeitheranequaltimeorlessormoretimeincomparisonwiththatofanotherthing,andsince,whereasathingisslowerifitsmotionoccupiesmoretimeandofequalvelocityifitsmotionoccupiesanequaltime,thequickerisneitherofequalvelocitynorslower,itfollowsthatthemotionofthequickercanoccupyneitheranequaltimenormoretime。Itcanonlybe,then,thatitoccupieslesstime,andthuswegetthenecessaryconsequencethatthequickerwillpassoveranequalmagnitude(aswellasagreater)inlesstimethantheslower。
Andsinceeverymotionisintimeandamotionmayoccupyanytime,andthemotionofeverythingthatisinmotionmaybeeitherquickerorslower,bothquickermotionandslowermotionmayoccupyanytime:andthisbeingso,itnecessarilyfollowsthattimealsoiscontinuous。BycontinuousImeanthatwhichisdivisibleintodivisiblesthatareinfinitelydivisible:andifwetakethisasthedefinitionofcontinuous,itfollowsnecessarilythattimeiscontinuous。Forsinceithasbeenshownthatthequickerwillpassoveranequalmagnitudeinlesstimethantheslower,supposethatA
isquickerandBslower,andthattheslowerhastraversedthemagnitudeGDinthetimeZH。Nowitisclearthatthequickerwilltraversethesamemagnitudeinlesstimethanthis:letussayinthetimeZO。Again,sincethequickerhaspassedoverthewholeDinthetimeZO,theslowerwillinthesametimepassoverGK,say,whichislessthanGD。AndsinceB,theslower,haspassedoverGKinthetimeZO,thequickerwillpassoveritinlesstime:sothatthetimeZOwillagainbedivided。AndifthisisdividedthemagnitudeGK
willalsobedividedjustasGDwas:andagain,ifthemagnitudeisdivided,thetimewillalsobedivided。Andwecancarryonthisprocessforever,takingtheslowerafterthequickerandthequickerafterthesloweralternately,andusingwhathasbeendemonstratedateachstageasanewpointofdeparture:forthequickerwilldividethetimeandtheslowerwilldividethelength。
If,then,thisalternationalwaysholdsgood,andateveryturninvolvesadivision,itisevidentthatalltimemustbecontinuous。
Andatthesametimeitisclearthatallmagnitudeisalsocontinuous;forthedivisionsofwhichtimeandmagnituderespectivelyaresusceptiblearethesameandequal。
Moreover,thecurrentpopularargumentsmakeitplainthat,iftimeiscontinuous,magnitudeiscontinuousalso,inasmuchasathingassesoverhalfagivenmagnitudeinhalfthetimetakentocoverthewhole:infactwithoutqualificationitpassesoveralessmagnitudeinlesstime;forthedivisionsoftimeandofmagnitudewillbethesame。Andifeitherisinfinite,soistheother,andtheoneissointhesamewayastheother;i。e。iftimeisinfiniteinrespectofitsextremities,lengthisalsoinfiniteinrespectofitsextremities:iftimeisinfiniteinrespectofdivisibility,lengthisalsoinfiniteinrespectofdivisibility:andiftimeisinfiniteinbothrespects,magnitudeisalsoinfiniteinbothrespects。
HenceZeno\'sargumentmakesafalseassumptioninassertingthatitisimpossibleforathingtopassoverorseverallytocomeincontactwithinfinitethingsinafinitetime。Fortherearetwosensesinwhichlengthandtimeandgenerallyanythingcontinuousarecalled\'infinite\':theyarecalledsoeitherinrespectofdivisibilityorinrespectoftheirextremities。Sowhileathinginafinitetimecannotcomeincontactwiththingsquantitativelyinfinite,itcancomeincontactwiththingsinfiniteinrespectofdivisibility:forinthissensethetimeitselfisalsoinfinite:
andsowefindthatthetimeoccupiedbythepassageovertheinfiniteisnotafinitebutaninfinitetime,andthecontactwiththeinfinitesismadebymeansofmomentsnotfinitebutinfiniteinnumber。
Thepassageovertheinfinite,then,cannotoccupyafinitetime,andthepassageoverthefinitecannotoccupyaninfinitetime:ifthetimeisinfinitethemagnitudemustbeinfinitealso,andifthemagnitudeisinfinite,soalsoisthetime。Thismaybeshownasfollows。LetABbeafinitemagnitude,andletussupposethatitistraversedininfinitetimeG,andletafiniteperiodGDofthetimebetaken。Nowinthisperiodthethinginmotionwillpassoveracertainsegmentofthemagnitude:letBEbethesegmentthatithasthuspassedover。(ThiswillbeeitheranexactmeasureofABorlessorgreaterthananexactmeasure:itmakesnodifferencewhichitis。)Then,sinceamagnitudeequaltoBEwillalwaysbepassedoverinanequaltime,andBEmeasuresthewholemagnitude,thewholetimeoccupiedinpassingoverABwillbefinite:foritwillbedivisibleintoperiodsequalinnumbertothesegmentsintowhichthemagnitudeisdivisible。Moreover,ifitisthecasethatinfinitetimeisnotoccupiedinpassingovereverymagnitude,butitispossibletoassoversomemagnitude,sayBE,inafinitetime,andifthisBE
measuresthewholeofwhichitisapart,andifanequalmagnitudeispassedoverinanequaltime,thenitfollowsthatthetimelikethemagnitudeisfinite。ThatinfinitetimewillnotbeoccupiedinpassingoverBEisevidentifthetimebetakenaslimitedinonedirection:forasthepartwillbepassedoverinlesstimethanthewhole,thetimeoccupiedintraversingthispartmustbefinite,thelimitinonedirectionbeinggiven。Thesamereasoningwillalsoshowthefalsityoftheassumptionthatinfinitelengthcanbetraversedinafinitetime。Itisevident,then,fromwhathasbeensaidthatneitheralinenorasurfacenorinfactanythingcontinuouscanbeindivisible。
Thisconclusionfollowsnotonlyfromthepresentargumentbutfromtheconsiderationthattheoppositeassumptionimpliesthedivisibilityoftheindivisible。Forsincethedistinctionofquickerandslowermayapplytomotionsoccupyinganyperiodoftimeandinanequaltimethequickerpassesoveragreaterlength,itmayhappenthatitwillpassoveralengthtwice,oroneandahalftimes,asgreatasthatpassedoverbytheslower:fortheirrespectivevelocitiesmaystandtooneanotherinthisproportion。
Suppose,then,thatthequickerhasinthesametimebeencarriedoveralengthoneandahalftimesasgreatasthattraversedbytheslower,andthattherespectivemagnitudesaredivided,thatofthequicker,themagnitudeABGD,intothreeindivisibles,andthatoftheslowerintothetwoindivisiblesEZ,ZH。Thenthetimemayalsobedividedintothreeindivisibles,foranequalmagnitudewillbepassedoverinanequaltime。SupposethenthatitisthusdividedintoKL,LM,MN。Again,sinceinthesametimetheslowerhasbeencarriedoverEZ,ZH,thetimemayalsobesimilarlydividedintotwo。Thustheindivisiblewillbedivisible,andthatwhichhasnopartswillbepassedovernotinanindivisiblebutinagreatertime。Itisevident,therefore,thatnothingcontinuousiswithoutparts。
3
Thepresentalsoisnecessarilyindivisible-thepresent,thatis,notinthesenseinwhichthewordisappliedtoonethinginvirtueofanother,butinitsproperandprimarysense;inwhichsenseitisinherentinalltime。Forthepresentissomethingthatisanextremityofthepast(nopartofthefuturebeingonthissideofit)
andalsoofthefuture(nopartofthepastbeingontheothersideofit):itis,aswehavesaid,alimitofboth。Andifitisonceshownthatitisessentiallyofthischaracterandoneandthesame,itwillatoncebeevidentalsothatitisindivisible。
Nowthepresentthatistheextremityofbothtimesmustbeoneandthesame:forifeachextremityweredifferent,theonecouldnotbeinsuccessiontotheother,becausenothingcontinuouscanbecomposedofthingshavingnoparts:andiftheoneisapartfromtheother,therewillbetimeintermediatebetweenthem,becauseeverythingcontinuousissuchthatthereissomethingintermediatebetweenitslimitsanddescribedbythesamenameasitself。Butiftheintermediatethingistime,itwillbedivisible:foralltimehasbeenshowntobedivisible。Thusonthisassumptionthepresentisdivisible。Butifthepresentisdivisible,therewillbepartofthepastinthefutureandpartofthefutureinthepast:forpasttimewillbemarkedofffromfuturetimeattheactualpointofdivision。Alsothepresentwillbeapresentnotinthepropersensebutinvirtueofsomethingelse:forthedivisionwhichyieldsitwillnotbeadivisionproper。Furthermore,therewillbeapartofthepresentthatispastandapartthatisfuture,anditwillnotalwaysbethesamepartthatispastorfuture:infactoneandthesamepresentwillnotbesimultaneous:forthetimemaybedividedatmanypoints。If,therefore,thepresentcannotpossiblyhavethesecharacteristics,itfollowsthatitmustbethesamepresentthatbelongstoeachofthetwotimes。Butifthisissoitisevidentthatthepresentisalsoindivisible:forifitisdivisibleitwillbeinvolvedinthesameimplicationsasbefore。Itisclear,then,fromwhathasbeensaidthattimecontainssomethingindivisible,andthisiswhatwecallapresent。
Wewillnowshowthatnothingcanbeinmotioninapresent。Forifthisispossible,therecanbebothquickerandslowermotioninthepresent。SupposethenthatinthepresentNthequickerhastraversedthedistanceAB。Thatbeingso,theslowerwillinthesamepresenttraverseadistancelessthanAB,sayAG。ButsincetheslowerwillhaveoccupiedthewholepresentintraversingAG,thequickerwilloccupylessthanthisintraversingit。Thusweshallhaveadivisionofthepresent,whereaswefoundittobeindivisible。
Itisimpossible,therefore,foranythingtobeinmotioninapresent。
Norcananythingbeatrestinapresent:for,asweweresaying,onlycanbeatrestwhichisnaturallydesignedtobeinmotionbutisnotinmotionwhen,where,orasitwouldnaturallybeso:since,therefore,nothingisnaturallydesignedtobeinmotioninapresent,itisclearthatnothingcanbeatrestinapresenteither。
Moreover,inasmuchasitisthesamepresentthatbelongstoboththetimes,anditispossibleforathingtobeinmotionthroughoutonetimeandtobeatrestthroughouttheother,andthatwhichisinmotionoratrestforthewholeofatimewillbeinmotionoratrestasthecasemaybeinanypartofitinwhichitisnaturallydesignedtobeinmotionoratrest:thisbeingso,theassumptionthattherecanbemotionorrestinapresentwillcarrywithittheimplicationthatthesamethingcanatthesametimebeatrestandinmotion:forboththetimeshavethesameextremity,viz。thepresent。
Again,whenwesaythatathingisatrest,weimplythatitsconditioninwholeandinpartisatthetimeofspeakinguniformwithwhatitwaspreviously:butthepresentcontainsno\'previously\':
consequently,therecanbenorestinit。
Itfollowsthenthatthemotionofthatwhichisinmotionandtherestofthatwhichisatrestmustoccupytime。
4
Further,everythingthatchangesmustbedivisible。Forsinceeverychangeisfromsomethingtosomething,andwhenathingisatthegoalofitschangeitisnolongerchanging,andwhenbothititselfandallitspartsareatthestarting-pointofitschangeitisnotchanging(forthatwhichisinwholeandinpartinanunvaryingconditionisnotinastateofchange);itfollows,therefore,thatpartofthatwhichischangingmustbeatthestarting-pointandpartatthegoal:forasawholeitcannotbeinbothorinneither。
(Hereby\'goalofchange\'Imeanthatwhichcomesfirstintheprocessofchange:e。g。inaprocessofchangefromwhitethegoalinquestionwillbegrey,notblack:foritisnotnecessarythatthatthatwhichischangingshouldbeateitheroftheextremes。)Itisevident,therefore,thateverythingthatchangesmustbedivisible。
Nowmotionisdivisibleintwosenses。Inthefirstplaceitisdivisibleinvirtueofthetimethatitoccupies。Inthesecondplaceitisdivisibleaccordingtothemotionsoftheseveralpartsofthatwhichisinmotion:e。g。ifthewholeAGisinmotion,therewillbeamotionofABandamotionofBG。Thatbeingso,letDEbethemotionofthepartABandEZthemotionofthepartBG。ThenthewholeDZmustbethemotionofAG:forDZmustconstitutethemotionofAG
inasmuchasDEandEZseverallyconstitutethemotionsofeachofitsparts。Butthemotionofathingcanneverbeconstitutedbythemotionofsomethingelse:consequentlythewholemotionisthemotionofthewholemagnitude。
Again,sinceeverymotionisamotionofsomething,andthewholemotionDZisnotthemotionofeitheroftheparts(foreachofthepartsDE,EZisthemotionofoneofthepartsAB,BG)orofanythingelse(for,thewholemotionbeingthemotionofawhole,thepartsofthemotionarethemotionsofthepartsofthatwhole:
andthepartsofDZarethemotionsofAB,BGandofnothingelse:
for,aswesaw,amotionthatisonecannotbethemotionofmorethingsthanone):sincethisisso,thewholemotionwillbethemotionofthemagnitudeABG。
Again,ifthereisamotionofthewholeotherthanDZ,saythetheofeachoftheartsmaybesubtractedfromit:andthesemotionswillbeequaltoDE,EZrespectively:forthemotionofthatwhichisonemustbeone。SoifthewholemotionOImaybedividedintothemotionsoftheparts,OIwillbeequaltoDZ:ifontheotherhandthereisanyremainder,sayKI,thiswillbeamotionofnothing:
foritcanbethemotionneitherofthewholenoroftheparts(asthemotionofthatwhichisonemustbeone)norofanythingelse:foramotionthatiscontinuousmustbethemotionofthingsthatarecontinuous。AndthesameresultfollowsifthedivisionofOI
revealsasurplusonthesideofthemotionsoftheparts。
Consequently,ifthisisimpossible,thewholemotionmustbethesameasandequaltoDZ。
Thistheniswhatismeantbythedivisionofmotionaccordingtothemotionsoftheparts:anditmustbeapplicabletoeverythingthatisdivisibleintoparts。
Motionisalsosusceptibleofanotherkindofdivision,thataccordingtotime。Forsinceallmotionisintimeandalltimeisdivisible,andinlesstimethemotionisless,itfollowsthateverymotionmustbedivisibleaccordingtotime。Andsinceeverythingthatisinmotionisinmotioninacertainsphereandforacertaintimeandhasamotionbelongingtoit,itfollowsthatthetime,themotion,thebeing-in-motion,thethingthatisinmotion,andthesphereofthemotionmustallbesusceptibleofthesamedivisions(thoughspheresofmotionarenotalldivisibleinalikemanner:thusquantityisessentially,qualityaccidentallydivisible)。ForsupposethatAisthetimeoccupiedbythemotionB。Thenifallthetimehasbeenoccupiedbythewholemotion,itwilltakelessofthemotiontooccupyhalfthetime,lessagaintooccupyafurthersubdivisionofthetime,andsoontoinfinity。Again,thetimewillbedivisiblesimilarlytothemotion:forifthewholemotionoccupiesallthetimehalfthemotionwilloccupyhalfthetime,andlessofthemotionagainwilloccupylessofthetime。
Inthesamewaythebeing-in-motionwillalsobedivisible。ForletGbethewholebeing-in-motion。Thenthebeing-in-motionthatcorrespondstohalfthemotionwillbelessthanthewholebeing-in-motion,thatwhichcorrespondstoaquarterofthemotionwillbelessagain,andsoontoinfinity。Moreoverbysettingoutsuccessivelythebeing-in-motioncorrespondingtoeachofthetwomotionsDG(say)andGE,wemayarguethatthewholebeing-in-motionwillcorrespondtothewholemotion(forifitweresomeotherbeing-in-motionthatcorrespondedtothewholemotion,therewouldbemorethanonebeing-inmotioncorrespondingtothesamemotion),theargumentbeingthesameasthatwherebyweshowedthatthemotionofathingisdivisibleintothemotionsofthepartsofthething:forifwetakeseparatelythebeing-inmotioncorrespondingtoeachofthetwomotions,weshallseethatthewholebeing-inmotioniscontinuous。
Thesamereasoningwillshowthedivisibilityofthelength,andinfactofeverythingthatformsasphereofchange(thoughsomeoftheseareonlyaccidentallydivisiblebecausethatwhichchangesisso):forthedivisionofonetermwillinvolvethedivisionofall。
So,too,inthematteroftheirbeingfiniteorinfinite,theywillallalikebeeithertheoneortheother。Andwenowseethatinmostcasesthefactthatallthetermsaredivisibleorinfiniteisadirectconsequenceofthefactthatthethingthatchangesisdivisibleorinfinite:fortheattributes\'divisible\'and\'infinite\'
belonginthefirstinstancetothethingthatchanges。Thatdivisibilitydoessowehavealreadyshown:thatinfinitydoessowillbemadeclearinwhatfollows?