第7章

类别:其他 作者:Thorstein Veblen字数:6250更新时间:18/12/26 16:50:16
Thisprocessofprogressiveexemptionfromthecommonrunofindustrialemploymentwillcommonlybeginwiththeexemptionofthewife,orthechiefwife。Afterthecommunityhasadvancedtosettledhabitsoflife,wife-capturefromhostiletribesbecomesimpracticableasacustomarysourceofsupply。Wherethisculturaladvancehasbeenachieved,thechiefwifeisordinarilyofgentleblood,andthefactofherbeingsowillhastenherexemptionfromvulgaremployment。Themannerinwhichtheconceptofgentlebloodoriginates,aswellastheplacewhichitoccupiesinthedevelopmentofmarriage,cannotbediscussedinthisplace。Forthepurposeinhanditwillbesufficienttosaythatgentlebloodisbloodwhichhasbeenennobledbyprotractedcontactwithaccumulatedwealthorunbrokenprerogative。Thewomenwiththeseantecedentsispreferredinmarriage,bothforthesakeofaresultingalliancewithherpowerfulrelativesandbecauseasuperiorworthisfelttoinhereinbloodwhichhasbeenassociatedwithmanygoodsandgreatpower。Shewillstillbeherhusband’schattel,asshewasherfather’schattelbeforeherpurchase,butsheisatthesametimeofherfather’sgentleblood;andhencethereisamoralincongruityinheroccupyingherselfwiththedebasingemploymentsofherfellow-servants。 Howevercompletelyshemaybesubjecttohermaster,andhoweverinferiortothemalemembersofthesocialstratuminwhichherbirthhasplacedher,theprinciplethatgentilityistransmissiblewillacttoplaceherabovethecommonslave;andsosoonasthisprinciplehasacquiredaprescriptiveauthorityitwillacttoinvestherinsomemeasurewiththatprerogativeofleisurewhichisthechiefmarkofgentility。Furtheredbythisprincipleoftransmissiblegentilitythewife’sexemptiongainsinscope,ifthewealthofherownerpermitsit,untilitincludesexemptionfromdebasingmenialserviceaswellasfromhandicraft。Astheindustrialdevelopmentgoesonandpropertybecomesmassedinrelativelyfewerhands,theconventionalstandardofwealthoftheupperclassrises。Thesametendencytoexemptionfromhandicraft,andinthecourseoftimefrommenialdomesticemployments,willthenassertitselfasregardstheotherwives,ifsuchthereare,andalsoasregardsotherservantsinimmediateattendanceuponthepersonoftheirmaster。 Theexemptioncomesmoretardilytheremotertherelationinwhichtheservantstandstothepersonofthemaster。 Ifthepecuniarysituationofthemasterpermitsit,thedevelopmentofaspecialclassofpersonalorbodyservantsisalsofurtheredbytheverygraveimportancewhichcomestoattachtothispersonalservice。Themaster’sperson,beingtheembodimentofworthandhonour,isofthemostseriousconsequence。Bothforhisreputablestandinginthecommunityandforhisself-respect,itisamatterofmomentthatheshouldhaveathiscallefficientspecialisedservants,whoseattendanceuponhispersonisnotdivertedfromthistheirchiefofficebyanyby-occupation。Thesespecialisedservantsareusefulmoreforshowthanforserviceactuallyperformed。Insofarastheyarenotkeptforexhibitionsimply,theyaffordgratificationtotheirmasterchieflyinallowingscopetohispropensityfordominance。Itistrue,thecareofthecontinuallyincreasinghouseholdapparatusmayrequireaddedlabour;butsincetheapparatusiscommonlyincreasedinordertoserveasameansofgoodreputeratherthanasameansofcomfort,thisqualificationisnotofgreatweight。Alltheselinesofutilityarebetterservedbyalargernumberofmorehighlyspecialisedservants。 Thereresults,therefore,aconstantlyincreasingdifferentiationandmultiplicationofdomesticandbodyservants,alongwithaconcomitantprogressiveexemptionofsuchservantsfromproductivelabour。Byvirtueoftheirservingasevidenceofabilitytopay,theofficeofsuchdomesticsregularlytendstoincludecontinuallyfewerduties,andtheirservicetendsintheendtobecomenominalonly。Thisisespeciallytrueofthoseservantswhoareinmostimmediateandobviousattendanceupontheirmaster。Sothattheutilityofthesecomestoconsist,ingreatpart,intheirconspicuousexemptionfromproductivelabourandintheevidencewhichthisexemptionaffordsoftheirmaster’swealthandpower。 Aftersomeconsiderableadvancehasbeenmadeinthepracticeofemployingaspecialcorpsofservantsfortheperformanceofaconspicuousleisureinthismanner,menbegintobepreferredabovewomenforservicesthatbringthemobtrusivelyintoview。Men,especiallylusty,personablefellows,suchasfootmenandothermenialsshouldbe,areobviouslymorepowerfulandmoreexpensivethanwomen。Theyarebetterfittedforthiswork,asshowingalargerwasteoftimeandofhumanenergy。 Henceitcomesaboutthatintheeconomyoftheleisureclassthebusyhousewifeoftheearlypatriarchaldays,withherretinueofhard-workinghandmaidens,presentlygivesplacetotheladyandthelackey。 Inallgradesandwalksoflife,andatanystageoftheeconomicdevelopment,theleisureoftheladyandofthelackeydiffersfromtheleisureofthegentlemaninhisownrightinthatitisanoccupationofanostensiblylaboriouskind。Ittakestheform,inlargemeasure,ofapainstakingattentiontotheserviceofthemaster,ortothemaintenanceandelaborationofthehouseholdparaphernalia;sothatitisleisureonlyinthesensethatlittleornoproductiveworkisperformedbythisclass,notinthesensethatallappearanceoflabourisavoidedbythem。Thedutiesperformedbythelady,orbythehouseholdordomesticservants,arefrequentlyarduousenough,andtheyarealsofrequentlydirectedtoendswhichareconsideredextremelynecessarytothecomfortoftheentirehousehold。Sofarastheseservicesconducetothephysicalefficiencyorcomfortofthemasterortherestofthehousehold,theyaretobeaccountedproductivework。Onlytheresidueofemploymentleftafterdeductionofthiseffectiveworkistobeclassedasaperformanceofleisure。 Butmuchoftheservicesclassedashouseholdcaresinmoderneverydaylife,andmanyofthe“utilities“requiredforacomfortableexistencebycivilisedman,areofaceremonialcharacter。Theyare,therefore,properlytobeclassedasaperformanceofleisureinthesenseinwhichthetermishereused。Theymaybenonethelessimperativelynecessaryfromthepointofviewofdecentexistence:theymaybenonethelessrequisiteforpersonalcomforteven,althoughtheymaybechieflyorwhollyofaceremonialcharacter。Butinsofarastheypartakeofthischaractertheyareimperativeandrequisitebecausewehavebeentaughttorequirethemunderpainofceremonialuncleannessorunworthiness。Wefeeldiscomfortintheirabsence,butnotbecausetheirabsenceresultsdirectlyinphysicaldiscomfort;norwouldatastenottrainedtodiscriminatebetweentheconventionallygoodandtheconventionallybadtakeoffenceattheiromission。Insofarasthisistruethelabourspentintheseservicesistobeclassedasleisure;andwhenperformedbyothersthantheeconomicallyfreeandself-directedheadoftheestablishment,theyaretobeclassedasvicariousleisure。 Thevicariousleisureperformedbyhousewivesandmenials,undertheheadofhouseholdcares,mayfrequentlydevelopintodrudgery,especiallywherethecompetitionforreputabilityiscloseandstrenuous。Thisisfrequentlythecaseinmodernlife。 Wherethishappens,thedomesticservicewhichcomprisesthedutiesofthisservantclassmightaptlybedesignatedaswastedeffort,ratherthanasvicariousleisure。Butthelattertermhastheadvantageofindicatingthelineofderivationofthesedomesticoffices,aswellasofneatlysuggestingthesubstantialeconomicgroundoftheirutility;fortheseoccupationsarechieflyusefulasamethodofimputingpecuniaryreputabilitytothemasterortothehouseholdonthegroundthatagivenamountoftimeandeffortisconspicuouslywastedinthatbehalf。 Inthisway,then,therearisesasubsidiaryorderivativeleisureclass,whoseofficeistheperformanceofavicariousleisureforthebehoofofthereputabilityoftheprimaryorlegitimateleisureclass。Thisvicariousleisureclassisdistinguishedfromtheleisureclassproperbyacharacteristicfeatureofitshabitualmodeoflife。Theleisureofthemasterclassis,atleastostensibly,anindulgenceofaproclivityfortheavoidanceoflabourandispresumedtoenhancethemaster’sownwell-beingandfulnessoflife;buttheleisureoftheservantclassexemptfromproductivelabourisinsomesortaperformanceexactedfromthem,andisnotnormallyorprimarilydirectedtotheirowncomfort。Theleisureoftheservantisnothisownleisure。Sofarasheisaservantinthefullsense,andnotatthesametimeamemberofalowerorderoftheleisureclassproper,hisleisurenormallypassesundertheguiseofspecialisedservicedirectedtothefurtheranceofhismaster’sfulnessoflife。Evidenceofthisrelationofsubservienceisobviouslypresentintheservant’scarriageandmanneroflife。 Thelikeisoftentrueofthewifethroughouttheprotractedeconomicstageduringwhichsheisstillprimarilyaservant—— thatistosay,solongasthehouseholdwithamaleheadremainsinforce。Inordertosatisfytherequirementsoftheleisureclassschemeoflife,theservantshouldshownotonlyanattitudeofsubservience,butalsotheeffectsofspecialtrainingandpracticeinsubservience。Theservantorwifeshouldnotonlyperformcertainofficesandshowaserviledisposition,butitisquiteasimperativethattheyshouldshowanacquiredfacilityinthetacticsofsubservience——atrainedconformitytothecanonsofeffectualandconspicuoussubservience。Eventodayitisthisaptitudeandacquiredskillintheformalmanifestationoftheservilerelationthatconstitutesthechiefelementofutilityinourhighlypaidservants,aswellasoneofthechiefornamentsofthewell-bredhousewife。 Thefirstrequisiteofagoodservantisthatheshouldconspicuouslyknowhisplace。Itisnotenoughthatheknowshowtoeffectcertaindesiredmechanicalresults;hemustaboveall,knowhowtoeffecttheseresultsindueform。Domesticservicemightbesaidtobeaspiritualratherthanamechanicalfunction。Graduallytheregrowsupanelaboratesystemofgoodform,specificallyregulatingthemannerinwhichthisvicariousleisureoftheservantclassistobeperformed。Anydeparturefromthesecanonsofformistobedepreciated,notsomuchbecauseitevincesashortcominginmechanicalefficiency,oreventhatitshowsanabsenceoftheservileattitudeandtemperament,butbecause,inthelastanalysis,itshowstheabsenceofspecialtraining。Specialtraininginpersonalservicecoststimeandeffort,andwhereitisobviouslypresentinahighdegree,itarguesthattheservantwhopossessesit,neitherisnorhasbeenhabituallyengagedinanyproductiveoccupation。 Itisprimafacieevidenceofavicariousleisureextendingfarbackinthepast。Sothattrainedservicehasutility,notonlyasgratifyingthemaster’sinstinctivelikingforgoodandskilfulworkmanshipandhispropensityforconspicuousdominanceoverthosewhoselivesaresubservienttohisown,butithasutilityalsoasputtinginevidenceamuchlargerconsumptionofhumanservicethanwouldbeshownbythemerepresentconspicuousleisureperformedbyanuntrainedperson。Itisaseriousgrievanceifagentleman’sbutlerorfootmanperformshisdutiesabouthismaster’stableorcarriageinsuchunformedstyleastosuggestthathishabitualoccupationmaybeploughingorsheepherding。Suchbunglingworkwouldimplyinabilityonthemaster’sparttoprocuretheserviceofspeciallytrainedservants;thatistosay,itwouldimplyinabilitytopayfortheconsumptionoftime,effort,andinstructionrequiredtofitatrainedservantforspecialserviceundertheexactingcodeofforms。Iftheperformanceoftheservantargueslackofmeansonthepartofhismaster,itdefeatsitschiefsubstantialend;forthechiefuseofservantsistheevidencetheyaffordofthemaster’sabilitytopay。 Whathasjustbeensaidmightbetakentoimplythattheoffenceofanunder-trainedservantliesinadirectsuggestionofinexpensivenessorofusefulness。Such,ofcourse,isnotthecase。Theconnectionismuchlessimmediate。Whathappenshereiswhathappensgenerally。Whateverapprovesitselftousonanygroundattheoutset,presentlycomestoappealtousasagratifyingthinginitself;itcomestorestinourhabitsofthoughassubstantiallyright。Butinorderthatanyspecificcanonofdeportmentshallmaintainitselfinfavour,itmustcontinuetohavethesupportof,oratleastnotbeincompatiblewith,thehabitoraptitudewhichconstitutesthenormofitsdevelopment。Theneedofvicariousleisure,orconspicuousconsumptionofservice,isadominantincentivetothekeepingofservants。Solongasthisremainstrueitmaybesetdownwithoutmuchdiscussionthatanysuchdeparturefromacceptedusageaswouldsuggestanabridgedapprenticeshipinservicewouldpresentlybefoundinsufferable。Therequirementofanexpensivevicariousleisureactsindirectly,selectively,byguidingtheformationofourtaste,——ofoursenseofwhatisrightinthesematters,——andsoweedsoutunconformabledeparturesbywithholdingapprovalofthem。 Asthestandardofwealthrecognizedbycommonconsentadvances,thepossessionandexploitationofservantsasameansofshowingsuperfluityundergoesarefinement。Thepossessionandmaintenanceofslavesemployedintheproductionofgoodsargueswealthandprowess,butthemaintenanceofservantswhoproducenothingarguesstillhigherwealthandposition。Underthisprincipletherearisesaclassofservants,themorenumerousthebetter,whosesoleofficeisfatuouslytowaituponthepersonoftheirowner,andsotoputinevidencehisabilityunproductivelytoconsumealargeamountofservice。Theresupervenesadivisionoflabouramongtheservantsordependentswhoselifeisspentinmaintainingthehonourofthegentlemanofleisure。Sothat,whileonegroupproducesgoodsforhim,anothergroup,usuallyheadedbythewife,orchief,consumesforhiminconspicuousleisure;therebyputtinginevidencehisabilitytosustainlargepecuniarydamagewithoutimpairinghissuperioropulence。