LectureI
TheMatrimonialCustomsandUsagesoftheRussianPeople，andtheLightTheyThrowontheEvolutionofMarriageThewidehistoricalstudiespursuedbymembersoftheUniversityofOxfordnecessarilyincludethestudyoftheSlavonicrace。Thepartwhichthisraceisbeginningtoplayintheeconomicandsocialprogressofourtime，andtheconsiderableachievementswhichithasalreadymadeinthefieldsofliteratureandsciencehaveattractedtheattentionevenofthosenationswhosepoliticalinterestsaresupposednottocoincidepreciselywiththoseoftheSlavs。TheIlchesterLectureswere，Ibelieve，foundedinordertomakeknowntoOxfordstudentsthepresentandpastofthisundoubtedlyAryanbranchofthehumanrace。Agooddealofworkhasalreadybeendonebymypredecessors。ProfessorThomson，ofCopenhagen，byhiscarefulstudyoftheNormanoriginoftheRussianState，hasgreatlycontributedtounveileventoRussiansthemysteryoftheirfar-distantpast，whileProfessorTurner，inthecourseofhisbrilliantlectureslastyear，madeyouacquaintedwithourbestmodernnovelists。Idonotknowifmyfriend，thelateMrW。R。S。Ralston，everlecturedintheTaylorinstitute，buttheaccurateandlivelyaccountshehasgivenofRussianepicpoemsandpopulartaleswereundoubtedlywrittenundertheinfluenceofthesamefeelingsasthosewhichinspiredthefounderoftheselectures。
InEnglandtheworksofRalstonwerethefirsttodealwiththevastfieldofSlavonic，andmoreespeciallyofRussian，folk-lore。HischiefendeavourwastoshowthegreatamountofinformationwhichtheunwrittenliteratureofRussiacontainsastotheearlystagesofreligiousdevelopment。ButRussianfolk-loremayinterestalawyeraswellasamythologist；itsstudymayenrichcomparativejurisprudencewithnewmaterialnotlessthancomparativemythology。ItcannodoubtunveilmorethanonemysteryconcerningtheearlystateofEuropeanfamilylaw，andthevariousmodesinwhichlandwasheldbyourremotestancestors。Thefirststagesinthehistoryofpoliticalinstitutions，andmoreparticularlythepartwhichthecommonpeoplewerecalleduponinolddaystoplayinthemanagementofpublicaffairs，canbeillustratedbythehistoryofRussianfolk-motesandRussiannationalcouncils，muchbetterthanbyreferencetotheshortnoticesleftbyCaesarorTacitusofthepopularassembliesoftheGermans。Russianserfdom，andthehistoryofitsabolition，mayalsobeinstructiveinmorethanonepoint，eventothosewhosechiefpurposeistostudytheorigin，thegrowth，andtheabolitionofpersonalservitudeinEngland，France，orGermany。
WhenIlooktothegreatimportanceofthemoderncustomsandancientlawsofRussiaasregardsthecomparativehistoryofinstitutions，Iconfidentlyhopetomeetonyourpartwiththeindulgencewhichthelecturerneedswhoaddresseshisaudienceinaforeigntongue。IthinkthatthestudyofRussianlegalantiquitiesmaytoacertainextentbeconsideredasanecessaryappendageofthoseexhaustiveinquiriesinIndianandoldCelticinstitutionsforwhichweareindebtedtooneofyourmostcelebratedwriters，thelateSirHenryMaine。Ifeelthemorepleasureinmentioninghisname，asitwasbyhimthatmyfirstworksinthefieldofcomparativejurisprudencewereinspired。
Hislectureshavefoundreadersintheremotestpartsoftheworld，andhavesuggestedtomorethanoneforeignscholartheideaofre-writingthelegalhistoryofhisowncountry。
AlthoughrecognisinginhimthechiefrepresentativeofthelegalschooltowhichIbelong，Ishallmorethanonceputforwardtheorieswhicharealtogetheropposedtohis：suchanoccasionpresentsitselfatonceinthestudyofearlyRussianfamilylaw。
Thisstudywill，Ihavenodoubt，throwaclearlightontheearliestperiodintheevolutionofmarriage——thatofthematriarchate。IinsistthemoreonthispointbecauseinEnglandanopinionhasbeenexpressedthatthecustomarylawofRussiamightbeexpectedtogiveanotherillustrationofthegeneralprevalenceofthepatriarchalfamilyeveninthefirststagesofsocialdevelopment。SirHenryMainehasmorethanonce（1*）
expressedthisopinion，andhasfoundconfirmationforitincertainquotationsmadechieflyfromthewell-knownworksofHaxthausenandMackenzieWallace。Boththeseauthors，makingalargeuseoftherichethnographicalliteratureofRussia，havecorrectlydescribedtheprevailingsystemofRussianjointfamilies，orhousecommunities，andtheiraccountmaybetakengenerallyasagoodillustrationoftheoldpatriarchalfamilyoftheGermansandCelts。Butneitherofthemhadanyopportunityofstudyingindetailthenumeroussurvivalswhichwestillfindofastateofthingswhichhadnothingincommonwithagnatism，orevenwithafirmlyestablished\"patriapotestas。\"Suchwasnot，afterall，thepurposethattheyhadinview。TheirswasthestudyofcontemporarylifeinRussiansociety，andthequestionoftheprimitivestateoffamilyrelationsinRussiacannotbesettledbyreferencetoworkswhichdonotdealwiththesubject。
SirHenryMainewasalsomisledinhissurveyofSlavonicfamilylawbythewell-knownBohemianorCzechpoem，\"TheTrialofthePrincessLiuhouscha。\"Thispoemhequotesatgreatlength，andhestatesthatitleavesnodoubtastotheexistenceofasortofundividedfamilyorhouse-communityinthemostremoteperiodofBohemianhistory。Unfortunately，thepoemonwhichhebuildshisconclusionisnowunanimouslydeclaredbothbySlavonicandGermanscholarstobeaforgerybythewell-knownBohemianphilologist，Hanka。Itisclear，therefore，thatthewholeofhistheory，sofarasitdealswithSlavoniclawandusage，isbasedeitheronfactswhichconcernmoderntimesalone，andhavenothingtodowithancienttimes，orondocumentsmanifestlyfalse。
NowletusseewhatevidencewepossessastothecharacterofearlySlavonicfamilylaw。Weshallfirstgiveourauthorities，andthenproceedtodrawourgeneralconclusions。
TheearliestevidencewhichwepossessastothesocialrelationsoftheEasternSlavs，whoseconfederacywasthebeginningoftheRussianState，iscontainedintheso-calledChronicleofNestor。NestorissupposedtohavebeenaRussianmonkoftheeleventhcentury。
ContrastingthemodeoflifeofthemostcivilisedSlavonicnation，thePolians，whowereestablishedonthebanksoftheDnieper，withthatofthemorebarbaroustribesofRussia，Nestor，orperhapsitisbettertosay，theunknownauthoroftheChroniclewhichbearsthisname，statesasfollows（Itranslateliterally）：\"Eachtribehaditsowncustoms，andthelawsofitsforefathersanditsowntraditions，eachitsownmanneroflife（nrav）。ThePolianshadthecustomsoftheirfathers，customsmildandpeaceful（tichi）；theyshowedakindofreserve（stidenie）towardsthedaughtersoftheirsonsandtowardstheirsisters，towardstheirmothersandtheirparents，towardsthemothersoftheirwives，andtowardsthebrothersoftheirhusbands；toallofthepersonsnamedtheyshowedgreatreserve。
Amongstthemthebridegroomdidnotgotoseekhisbride；shewastakentohimintheevening，andthefollowingmorningtheybroughtwhatwasgivenforher。\"
\"AnotherSlavonictribe，theDrevlians，accordingtothesamechronicler，livedlikebeasts；theykilledoneanother，theyfedonthingsunclean；nomarriagetookplaceamongstthem，buttheycapturedyounggirlsonthebanksofrivers。\"
ThesameauthornarratesthatthreeotherSlavonictribes，theRadimich，theViatich，andtheSever，hadthesamecustoms；
theylived\"inforests，likeotherwildanimals，theyateeverythingunclean，andshamefulthingsoccurredamongstthembetweenfathersanddaughters-in-law。Marriageswereunknowntothem，butgameswereheldintheoutskirtsofvillages；theymetatthesegamesfordancingandeverykindofdiabolicamusement，andtheretheycapturedtheirwives，eachmantheonehehadcovenantedwith。Theyhadgenerallytwoorthreewives。\"
IhavetriedtogiveyouthenearestpossibletranslationofthisoldRussiantext，theinterpretationofwhich，however，givesrisetocertaindifficultiesnotyetquitesettled。Iwillnowclassify，tothebestofmypower，thevariousfactswhichwecaninferfromthistext。Firstofall，itestablishesthefactthatmarriageinthesenseofaconstantunionbetweenhusbandandwife，wasnotageneralinstitutionamongtheEasternSlavs。
WiththeexceptionofthemorecivilisedPolians，noothertribeisstatedtohaveanynotionofit。Ofcoursethisdoesnotmeanthatallalikewereentirelyignorantofthemeaningoffamilylife。Itonlyweansthattheirmodeofconstitutingafamilydidnotcorrespondtotheideawhichtheauthor，who，aswehavesaid，wasamonk，entertainedastomatrimonialrelations。TheRadimich，Viatich，andSevercapturedtheirwivesafterhavingpreviouslycometoanagreementwiththem。ThiscertainlyisamethodwhichcannotmeetwiththeapprovalofaChristian，butneverthelessitismarriage。Wehavebeforeusanexampleofwhatethnologistshavenamed\"marriagebycapture。\"
TheDrevlianswereevenlessadvancedasregardstheintercoursebetweenthesexes。Theyalsohadgamesatwhichwomenwerecaptured；butnotawordissaidaboutanycovenantenteredintobythecaptorandhissupposedvictim。Neitherisanymentionmadeofthesegamesbeingheldontheboundariesoroutskirtsofvillages，afactwhichwouldpointtotheexistenceofasortofexogamyforbiddingunionsbetweenpersonsofthesamegens。InthedescriptionwhichthechroniclergivesoftheDrevlianswehaveaninstanceofanalmostunlimitedlicence，whilstinthatoftheRadimich，ViatichandSeverwefindapictureofanexogamouspeople；contractingmarriagebycapture，andyetretainingfromtheperiodofalmostunlimitedlicenceasortoffamilycommunismwhichappearsintherelationsbetweenfathersanddaughters-in-law。
NotraceofthiseitherlimitedorunlimitedpromiscuousnessistobefoundamongthePolians，whoaccordingtoouroldChronicler，\"conductedthemselveswithmuchreserve\"towardsdaughters-in-law，andsisters-in-law，towardsmothersandfathers，towardsfathers-in-lawandbrothers-in-law。TheyseemtohavebeenanexogamoustribeliketheRadimich，ViatichandSever，theirwivesbeingbroughttothemfromoutsidetheirowngens。Unlikethetribesjustmentionedtheydidnot，however，procurethembycapture。Itwasnotthecustomforthebridegroomstogoinsearchoftheirwives；theyreceivedthemfromthehandsoftheparentsofthewomen，andtheythenpaidthesumofmoneypreviouslyagreedupon。Thismeansthattheirmodeofconstitutingmarriagewasbybuyingtheirwives。ThewordsoftheChroniclerconcerningthesepaymentsisfarfrombeingclear，andRussianscholarshavetriedtointerprettheminthesenseof\"dower\"broughtbytherelativesofthewife。Butithasbeenrecentlyprovedthatnomentionof\"dower\"istobefoundinRussianchartersbeforethefifteenthcentury，andthatthewordvenousedinmediaevalRussiantodesignatethepaymentmadeonmarriage，hasnoothermeaningthanthatofpretiumnuptiale，orpaymentmadebythebridegroomtothefamilyofthebride。（2*）ThewordsofTacitusconcerningthedospaidamongsttheGermantribesbythefuturehusbandtohiswife’sfathergivepreciselythemeaningoftheoldRussianveno，andthrowalightonthesortofpaymentwhichthechronicleofNestorhadinview，whenspeakingofthematrimonialcustomsofthePolians。
ThetestimonyofouroldestChronicleconcerningthedifferentformsofmatrimonyamongtheeasternSlavsdeservesourclosestattention，becauseitis，inallpoints，confirmedbythestudyoftherestofouroldwrittenliterature，ofourepicpoems，ofourwedding-songs，andofthematrimonialusagesandcustomsstillorlatelyinexistenceincertainremotedistrictsofRussia。TheDrevliansarenottheonlySlavonictribetowhichthemediaevalchroniclesascribealowstateofmorality。ThesameisassertedoftheoldBohemiansorCzechsintheaccountgivenoftheirmannersandcustomsbyCosmasofPrague，aLatinannalistoftheeleventhcentury，whosays：Connubiaerantilliscommunia。Nammorepecudumsingulasadnoctesnovosprobanthymenaeos，etsurgenteaurora……ferreaamorisrumpuntvincula。\"
Thismeans：\"Theypractisedcommunalmarriage。For，likeanimals，theycontractedeachnightafreshmarriage，andassoonasthedawnappearedtheybroketheironbondsoflove。\"
Thisstatementisdirectlyconfirmedbythatofanothermedievalauthor，theunknownbiographerofSt。Adalbert。ThiswriterascribestheanimosityoftheBohemianpeopletowardsthesainttothefactofhisstrongoppositiontotheshamefulpromiscuitywhichinhistimeprevailedinBohemia。Itisconfirmed，also，bythemonkoftheRussianAbbeyofEleasar，knownbythenameofPamphil，wholivedinthesixteenthcentury。
Bothspeakoftheexistenceofcertainyearlyfestivalsatwhichgreatlicenceprevailed。Accordingtothelast-namedauthor，suchmeetingswereregularlyheldonthebordersoftheStateofNovgorodonthebanksofrivers，resembling，inthatparticular，theannualfestivalsmentionedbyNestor。Notlaterthanthebeginningofthesixteenthcentury，theywerecomplainedofbytheclergyoftheStateofPscov。ItwasatthattimethatPamphildrewuphislettertotheGovernoroftheState，admonishinghimtoputanendtotheseannualgatherings，sincetheironlyresultwasthecorruptionoftheyoungwomenandgirls。Accordingtotheauthorjustcited，themeetingstookplace，asarule，thedaybeforethefestivalofSt。JohntheBaptist，which，inpagantimes，wasthatofadivinityknownbythenameofJarilo，correspondingtothePriapusoftheGreeks。
Halfacenturylaterthenewecclesiasticalcode，compiledbyanassemblyofdivinesconvenedinMoscowbytheCzarIvantheTerrible，tookeffectualmeasuresforabolishingeveryvestigeofpaganism；amongstthem，theyearlyfestivalsheldonChristmasDay，onthedayofthebaptismofourLord，andonSt。JohntheBaptist，commonlycalledMidsummerDay。Ageneralfeatureofallthesefestivals，accordingtothecode，wastheprevalenceofthepromiscuousintercourseofthesexes。Howfartheclergysucceededinsuppressingtheseyearlymeetings，whichhadbeenregularlyheldforcenturiesbeforeonthebanksofrivers，wecannotpreciselysay，althoughthefactoftheiroccasionaloccurrence，eveninmoderntimes，doesnottendtoprovetheircompleteabolition。MorethanoncehaveIhadanopportunityofbeingpresentatthesenightlymeetings，heldattheendofJune，incommemorationofaheathendivinity。Theyusuallytakeplaceclosetoariverorpond；largefiresarelighted，andoverthemyoungcouples，bachelorsandunmarriedgirls，jumpbarefoot。I
haveneverfoundanytraceoflicentiousness；butthereisnodoubtthatcasesoflicencedooccur，thoughseldominourtime。
Thatafewcenturiesagotheywereveryfrequenthasbeenlatelyprovedbysomecuriousdocumentspreservedinthearchivesofsomeoftheprovincialecclesiasticalcouncils，particularlyinthoseexistingintheGovernmentofKharkov。Accordingtothesedocuments，thelocalclergywereengagedinconstantwarfarewiththeshamefullicentiousnesswhichprevailedattheeveningassemblesofthepeasants，andmorethanoncetheclergysucceededininducingtheauthoritiesofthevillagetodissolvetheassembliesbyforce。Thepriestswereoftenwounded，andobligedtoseekrefugeinthehousesofthevillageeldersfromthestoneswithwhichtheywerepelted。TheseeveningassembliesareknowntothepeopleofGreatRussiaunderthenameofPosidelki，andtotheLittleRussiansbythatofVechernitzi。
ThelicentiousnesswhichformedthecharacteristicfeatureofthesemeetingsthrowslightonthemotiveswhichinducethepeasantsofcertainGreatRussiancommunestoattachbutsmallimportancetovirginity。Russianethnographershavenotinfrequentlymentionedthefactofyoungmenlivingopenlywithunmarriedwomen，and，evenincaseofmarriage，ofgivingpreferencetothosewhowereknowntohavealreadybeenmothers。
Howeverpeculiarallthesefactsmayseem，theyareveryoftenmetwithamongpeopleofquiteadistinctrace。TheAllemanicpopulationsoftheGrisons，nolongeragothanthesixteenthcentury，heldregularmeetingswhichwerenotlessshamefulthanthoseoftheCossacks。TheKilbenenwereabolished，bylaw（3*）butanothercustom，indirectantagonismtomorality，continuedtoexistalloverthenortherncantonsofSwitzerlandandinthesouthernprovincesofWurtembergandofBaden。ImeanthecustomknownunderthenameofKirchgangorDorfgehen，which，accordingtothepopularsongs，consistedinnothingelsethantherightofabachelortobecometheloverofsomeyounggirl，andthatquiteopenly，andwiththeimpliedconsentoftheparentsofhissweetheart。MayIalsomentionasimilarcustomamongsttheWelsh，knownas\"bundling\"？Iamnotwellenoughinformedastothecharacterofthiscustomtoinsistonitsresemblancetothosealreadymentioned。ThelittleIhavesaidontheGermansurvivalsofearlylicencemaysufficetoestablishthisgeneralconclusion：thatthecomparativeimmoralityofRussianpeasantshasnoothercausethanthesurvivalamongstthemofnumerousvestigesoftheearlyformsofmarriage。
Anotherfeatureofthematriarchalfamily，thelackofanyprohibitionastomarriagesbetweenpersonswhoaresprungfromthesamefatherorgrandfather，isalsomentionedmorethanoncebyearlySlavonicwriters。SuchmarriageswerenotprohibitedbycustomamongtheoldBohemiansorCzechs。\"Populusmiscebaturcumcognatis，\"saysthebiographerofSt。Adalbert。Theyarealsofrequentlymentionedintheepicpoemsofourpeasants，theso-calledbilini，ofwhichthelateW。R。S。RalstonhasgiventoEnglishreadersanaccurateandprofoundanalysis。Iwillquotecertainpassagesfromthesepoemstogiveyouthefactsonwhichmytheoryisbased。
Oneofthemostcelebratedheroesofourpopularballads，IliaMourometz。encountersonedayafreebooternamedNightingale（SoloveiRazboinik）。\"Why，\"asksthehero，\"doallthychildrenlookalike？\"Nightingalegivesthefollowinganswer：\"Because，whenmysonisgrownup，Imarryhimtomydaughter；andwhenmydaughterisoldenough，Igivehermysonforahusband，andIdosoinorderthatmyracemaynotdieout。\"Anotherpopularballad，representingtheevilcustomsofformerdays，describestheminthefollowingmanner：
Brothermadewaruponbrother，Brothertooksistertowife。
EndogamousmarriagesstilloccurinafewveryremotepartsofRussia。SuchisthecaseincertainvillagesinthedistrictofOnega，andespeciallyinthatofLiamika，wherethepeasantsdotheirbesttoinfringethecanonicalprescriptionswhichdisallowmarriagebetweenbloodrelationstothefourthdegreeinclusively。ThesamehasalsobeennoticedincertainpartsoftheGovernmentofArchangel，quiteontheshoresoftheWhiteSea，wherethepeasantsareinthehabitofsayingthatmarriagesbetweenbloodrelationswillbeblessedwithamorerapidincreaseof\"cattle\"-theword\"cattle\"standinginthiscaseforchildren。InsomeprovincesofSiberiaandinthedistrictofVetlouga，whichbelongstotheGovernmentofNijniNovgorod，endogamousmarriages，thoughcontrarytotheprevailingcustomarelookeduponwithafavourableeye。（4*）
Anotherfact，whichdeservestheattentionofallpartisansofthetheoryofthematriarchate，firstpromulgatedbyMcLennan，is，thelargeindependenceenjoyedbytheSlavonicwomenofolddays。LetmefirstquotethewordsofCosmasofPrague，whichrelatetothissubject，andthenshowyouwhatillustrationtheyfindbothinwrittenliterature，andinpopularballadsandsongs。
Nonvirginesviri，sedipsoemetviros，quosetquandovoluerunt，accipiebant。
SuchisthestatementofCosmasPragensis，（ch。xxi）。Thismeans：\"Itisnotthemenwhochoosethemaids，butthemaidsthemselveswhotakethehusbandstheylike，andwhentheylike。\"
ThisfreedomoftheBohemiangirlstodisposeoftheirheartsaccordingtotheirownwishshowsthecomparativeindependenceoftheBohemianwomenatthatperiod。
Theoldestlegalcodeofthispeople，thesniem，seemstofavourthisindependencebyrecognisingtherightofthewomentobefreefromanywork，exceptthatwhichisconnectedwiththemaintenanceofthehousehold。（5*）
Confrontedwiththefactsjustbroughtforward，thepopularlegend，reportedbyCosmasinhischronicle，ofakindofBohemianAmazons，whotookanactivepartinthewarsofthetime，appearsinitstruelight。Freeastheywerefromthebondsofmarriage，notrelyingonhusbandsforthedefenceoftheirpersonsandestates，theoldBohemianAmazonswereprobablyverysimilartothosewarlikewomenwhostillappearintheKingofDahomey’sarmy，andwhointhetimeofPompeywereknowntoexistamongcertainautochthonictribesoftheCaucasus。AfactwellworthnoticeisthatthememoryofthesebellicosewomenisstillpreservedinthetraditionsoftheTcherkess，whocallthembythenameof\"emcheck。\"Giantesses，wanderingbythemselvesthroughthecountryandfightingtheheroestheymeetontheirway，arealsomentionedmorethanonceinourpopularballads，orbilini。Thenameunderwhichtheyareknownisthatofpolinitzi，thewordpolemeaningthefieldandinasecondarysensethebattle-field。
LiketheBohemiangirlsdescribedbyCosmasofPrague，theseRussianAmazonschosetheirloversastheyliked。
\"Isthyheartinclinedtoamuseitselfwithme？\"suchisthequestionaddressedtoIliaMourometzbyoneoftheseAmazons，theso-calledBeautifulPrincess。\"BemyhusbandandIwillbethywife，\"saysanotherofthesepolinitzi，AnastasiatheBeautiful，tothepaladin，TheodorTougariu。ItisnotthefreebooterNightingalewhochooseshiswife，northepaladinDobriniawhoisgoinginsearchofabride；botharerepresentedasacceptingtheoffersofbetrothalmadetothembytheRussianAmazons，ZapravaandMarina。（6*）
EvidenceofstillgreaterimportanceisthatoftheFrenchwriter，Beauplan，who，speakingofthemannersandcustomsoftheinhabitantsofLittleRussiaduringhistime，thelatterhalfoftheseventeenthcentury，statesasfollows：
\"IntheUkraine，contrarytothecustomofallothernations，thehusbandsdonotchoosetheirwives，butarethemselveschosenbytheirfutureconsorts。\"
IhopeIhavenowgivenanamountofinformationsufficienttoanswerthepurposeIhaveinview；whichisnoother，thantoshowthat，inalowstateofmorality，communalmarriagebetweennearrelationsandendogamywenthandinhandamongsttheearlySlavswithaconsiderabledegreeofindependenceamongtheweakersex。
Toallthesecharacteristicfeaturesofthematriarchatewemayaddthisveryimportantone，that，accordingtotheoldRussianlaw，thetiewhichunitesamantohissisterandthechildrenshehasbroughtintotheworld，wasconsideredtobecloserthanthatwhichunitestwobrothersortheuncleandhisnephew。Inasocietyorganisedontheprincipleofagnatism，thesonofasisterhasnoreasontointerfereinthepursuitofthemurdererofhisuncle。Thebrotherbelongsaltogethertoanotherclan，andthedutyofvengeancefallsexclusivelyonthepersonsofthatclan。ButsuchisbynomeansthepointofviewoftheoldRussianlaw，recognising，asitdoes，therightofthesister’ssontoavengethedeathofhisuncle。
\"Incaseamanshallhekilledbyaman，\"decreesthefirstarticleofthePravdaofYaroslav（thelexbarborumoftheRussians），\"vengeancemaybetakenbyason，incasehisfatherhasbeenkilled；bythefather，whenthesonfallsavictim；bythebrother’ssonandbythesonofasister。\"TheselastwordsareomittedinthelaterversionsofthePravda，afactwhichshowstheincreaseofagnaticorganisation，buttheyarefoundintheversiongenerallyrecognisedasthemostancient。
Thisclosetiebetweenbrotherandsister，betweentheuncleandthesister’schildren，stillexistsamongtheSouthernSlavs。
ProfessorBogisic。andafterhimMrKrauss，haveillustratedthisfactbytheepicsongsoftheServianpeople。TheyspeakofthecustomgenerallyinuseamongtheSouthernSlavsofsecuringfromapersontruthfulnessinisstatementsbytheinvocationofthenameofthesister。Theymention，too，thatpeculiarrelationofartificialbrotherhoodandsisterhood，intowhichyoungmenandyoungwomenbelongingtodifferentkindredsfrequentlyenter，inordertosecuretotheweakersexprotectionandhelp。
IhardlyneedinsistontheimportancewhichallthesefactshavewithregardtothetheoryofanearlymatiarchateamongtheSlavs，themoresobecausethishasalreadybeendoneinEnglandbyMrMcLennan，inhiswell-knownstudyonthePatriarchaltheory，andinGermanybyBachofeninoneofhisAntiquarianLetters。（7*）ButIshallcompletetheinformationwhichthesescholarshavegivenbycitingcertainpeculiarcustomsstillinuseamongRussianpeasants。
Whilstthefatherisconsideredtobetheproperpersontodisposeofthehandofthebride，thebrother，accordingtotheweddingritual，appearsasthechiefprotectorofhervirginity。
InmorethanoneprovinceofRussiathebrotherplaysanimportantpartinthatpotionofthenuptialceremonywhichmaybecalledbytheLatinnameofindomusdeductio。Assoonasthebridegroomhasmadehisappearanceinthecourt-yardofthefamilytowhichhisbridebelongs，thebrother，inaccordancewithanoldcustom，takeshisseatnextthebridewithanakedsword，oratleastastick，inhishand。Thebridegroom，orthegroomsman，askingtobeallowedtotakehisseat，receivesasanswer，thatthebrotheristheretokeepwardoverhissister，andthathewillnotconsenttoleavehisseatunlesshebepaidforit。\"Dearbrother，don’tgivemeawayfornothing。Askahundredroublesforme，fortheveilwhichcoversmyheadathousandroubles。Askformybeauty——Godaloneknowshowmuch。\"
Suchisthetenorofthesongcomposedfortheoccasion。\"Thebrother，atrueTartar，\"wereadinthetextofanothernuptialsong，\"hassoldhissisterforathaler，andherfairtressesforfiftycopecks。\"
InLittleRussiathedrawnswordwhichthebrotherholdsinhishandontheoccasionisornamentedwiththeredberriesoftheguelderrose，redbeingtheemblemofmaidenhoodamongSlavonicpeoples。Otheremblemsarethebindingofthebride’stresses，andtheveilwhichcoversherhead。Thebridegroomisnotallowedtoremovetheveil，nortounbindthetressesofhisfuturewife，unlessheconsentstopayasmallsumofmoneytoherbother。
Hithertowehaveconsideredthedifferentaspectsoftheearliestperiodintheevolutionofthefamily——thatwhichisknownbythetermofthematriarchate。Thevariousfeatureswhichcharacterisedtheloweststateoftherelationsbetweenthesexesdidnotvanishallatonce。Theincestuousrelationsbetweenpersonsofthesamebloodseemtohavebeenthefirsttodisappear。NofurthermentionoftheseoccursinNestor’sdescriptionoftheEasterntribes——theRadimich，Viatich，andSever。Thogtheypractisecommunalmarriagesofarthatfathersandsonshavewivesincommon，neverthelessfathersanddaughters，brothersandsisters，darenolongercohabitwitheachother，andiflicencestilloccursatsomeannualfestivities，itiskeptundersomecheck。
Thebilini，orpoplarballads，asalsotheoldlegendsandfolktales，oftenrepresentthattransientperiodofsocialevolution，whenendogamywasgraduallygivingwaytoexogamy，andrelationsbetweenpersonsofthesamekinwereforbidden。A
popularhero，knownbythenameofMichailoKasarinov，andbelongingtoalaterseriesofRussianpaladins，inoneoftheseballadsliberatesayoungRussiangirlfromtheyokeoftheTartars，andisonthepointofbecomingherlover，whenshedisclosestohimthesecretofherbirth，andprovesthatsheishissister。Thepaladinimmediatelyabandonshispurpose。Inanotherpopulartale，insertedbyAfanasievinhiscollectionofthesecuriousmonumentsofourunwrittenliterature，abotherisrepresentedasinsistingonmarryinghissister，andthelatterasstronglyprotestingagainsthisdesire。\"Whatdoyouproposetodo？\"sheasks。\"BethinkyouofGodandofthesin？Isitrightthatabrothershouldespousehisownsister？\"Thebrotherpersists，andthecoupleareonthepointofretiringwhentheearthopens，andthesister，unharmed，disappearsfromview。（8*）
Inanotherpopularlegend，ahusband，havingdiscoveredthathiswifeishisownsister，findsnomeansofescapebutthatofundertakingapilgrimageinordertoexpiatehissins。（9*）
Theprohibitionisgraduallyextendedtoallpersonsofthesamekin。Asong（10*）inVogueamongthepeasantryofLittleRussiaspeaksofabirdwishingtomarry，andfindingnobrideathisbirthplace，allthefemalesbeinghisrelations，thereremainsnothingforhimtodobuttocrossthesea，andseekabrideofanotherkinthanhisown。
ThecompletediscomfitureofendogamyinitslongstrugglewithexogamousprescriptionsisshowninthefactthatinsomepartsofRussia，asforinstanceinthegovernmentofSimbirsk，incertainvillagesofthegovernmentofOlonizk，andofthedistrictofSchadrinsk，inhabitedbytheCosacksoftheDon，thebrideisalwaystakenfromanothervillagethanthebridegroom’s。
Eveninprovincesinwhichnosimilarcustomisknowntoexist，theremembranceofthetimewhenexogamywasconsideredaduty，ispreservedinthefactthatthebridegroomisconstantlyspokenofasaforeigner（choujoy，choujaninin），andhisfriendsandattendantsarerepresentedascomingwithhimfromadistantcountry，inordertotakeawaythefuturespouse。
Theoriginofexogamyhasbeensoughtforinthefactofthegeneralprevalence，atacertainperiodofsocialdevelopment，ofthecustomofcapturingwives。Theco-existenceofbothcustomshasbeenalreadynoticedbytheoldRussianchroniclerinhisdescriptionofthemannersandcustomsoftheRadimich，Viatich，andSever。Histestimonyiscorroboratedbythatofthenuptialsongs，andoftheceremoniesstillinuseatcountryweddings。
Theinformationwhichisderivedfromthesesourcesastothegeneralprevalenceinpasttimesofmarriagebycapture，IhavesummedupinaworkpublishedinRussianunderthetitleof\"ThefirstPeriodsintheEvolutionofLaw。\"Ishalltakethelibertyofbringingforwardto-daythefactstheresummarised。TheyconcerntheEasternaswellastheSouthernSlavs。
AmongsttheSouthernSlavs，marriagebycapturewasstillinexistencenolongeragothanthebeginningofthepresentcentury。Awell-knownServianwriter，VoukKaradjich，givesthefollowingdetailsaboutthispeculiarcustom，knownunderthenameofotmitza。\"TheCaptureofgirlsinordertomarrythemisstillpractisedamongtheServians。Youngmenveryfrequentlyhaverecoursetothismodeofprocuringawife。Onsuchoccasionstheyareequippedandarmedasiftheyweregoingouttodobattle。Theyconcealthemselves，andquietlyawaitthemomenttillthegirlpassesnearthemonherwaytolookafterthecattle。Sometimestheymakeadirectattackonthehomesteadsheinhabits。Ineithercaseherresistancehasnootherresultthanadirectappealtophysicalforce。Theyoungmenseizeherbyherlongplaitedtresses，dragandpushheralong，andsometimesuseawhiporasticktoquickenherpace。ThesamecustomprevailednotlongagoinMontenegro。ItexistedalsoforcenturiesinCroatia，asmaybeseenfromthementionmadeofitinthestatuteofPolitza，alegalcodepublishedin1605。InBosniaandHerzegovinaabductionsstilloccur，but，asarule，withthepreviousconsentofthesupposedvictim，andwiththedeclaredintentionofavoidingtheexpensesofaregularbetrothal。\"
SomuchasregardsmarriageamongtheSouthernSlavs。
AstotheEasternSlavs，theearlydevelopmentofastronggovernment，andofapowerfulclergy，preventedthepossibilityofalongcontinuanceofthiswildmethodofconstitutingafamily。Anexceptionmust，however，bemadeasregardstheCosacksofLittleRussiaandtheUkraine；who，accordingtothestatementofBeauplan，continuedtocapturetheirwivesnolongeragothantheseventeenthcentury。Buttheexistence，probablyinPagantimes，ofmarriagebycaptureinRussia，aswellasinPoland，isstillrevealedbytheoldballads，theweddingceremoniesofthecountrypeople，andthesongsinuseontheoccasionofabetrothal。
ThebilinimorethanoncementionthecasesofpaladinslikeIliaMourometzhavingapersonalencounterwiththeAmazonstheymeetontheirway。AssoonasthepaladinshavesucceededinvanquishingtheAmazons，theyforcethemtobecometheirwives。
Amongthedifferentceremoniesstillinuseatacountrywedding，oneparticularlydeservesourattention，onaccountofthesymbolicalrepresentationofthemeanstowhichthefamilyofthebrideoncehadrecoursetopreventanabduction。Onthedayfixedfortheweddingthedoorsleadingtothehomesteadofthebridearecloselyshut。Sometimesatemporarywoodenwalliserectedtopreservethefamilyfromintrusion。Thewedding-songsstillinuseintheGovernmentofToulaspeakofthenecessityofdefendingtheapproachtothebride’sresidencebyoaktrees，cutdowntoblockuptheroad，andbyshieldsarrangedbeforetheprincipalentranceofthehomestead。
Thebridegroomandhisfriendswearawarlikedress；theyaremountedonhorseback，andcarrygunsandpistols。Such，atleast，isthecustominthewesternprovincesofRussia，whilstinthesouthernthewhip，carriedbythebridegroom’sbestman，appearstobetheonlyweaponinuse。Thewedding-songsspeakofarrows，shotinthedirectionofthebride’shome，andofstonewallsbrokendown，inordertotakepossessionofher。Thebridegroomandhisfollowersareregularlymetlikefoes。IntheGovernmentofPermitisthecustomforthefatherofthebridetofireapistolovertheirheads，ofcourseapistolchargedonlywithpowder。ThesamecustomisalsoinuseincertainpartsoftheGovernmentofArchangel。Thewedding-songspeaksofthebridegroom’straininthefollowingterms：
Theywillcometothemaiden’sfatherWithwar。
Theywillrobhim，Andimprisonthemother。
TheywilltaketheyounggirlawayToastrangeland。
Butcapture，aswehavealreadyseen，wasnottheonlymodeofcontractingmarriageamongtheSlavs，evenintheearliestperiod。AccordingtothechronicleofNestor，thePoliansneverhadrecoursetoit。Insteadofcarryingoffhisbridebyforce，thePolianbridegroompreferredtopaytoherfather，orherfamily，asortofpretiumnuptiale，orbride-price。ThiscustomofthePoliansgraduallybecamethegeneralusageamongallSlavonictribes。InServia，accordingtoVoukKaradjich，thesumsofmoneypaidtothebride’sfatherbythebridegroom’sfamilyweresoexorbitantthatGeorgiustheBlackissuedaproclamationdeclaringittobeillegaltoaskfromthebridegroommorethanasingleducat。Inourdays，saysBogisic，wives，asarule，cannotbeboughtbytheirfuturehusbands，butareminiscenceofthisoldcustomisstillpreservedinthefactthatthebride’sfatherreceivesfromthebridegroomagiftinmoney，varyingfromonetosixducats，accordingtothefortuneofthegiver。
WiveswerealsoboughtandsoldamongtheSlavonictribesofAustria。AccordingtoanoldusageoftheLoujichan，aSlavonicpeopleinhabitingcertaindistrictsofHungary，thebridegroom，onenteringthehomesteadofhisbride，apostrophisedthefatherthus：\"Praydotellmeifyouhaveacowtosell？\"ABohemianwedding-songputsintothemouthofthebridegroom’sbestmanthefollowingsentence：\"Pleasedelivertomethebride。Iwillgiveyouagoodpriceforher。TheonlyreasonIhaveforbeinghereisthatImaypayyouinheavythalers。\"Nolongeragothanthebeginningofthelastcentury，youngmenwishingtomarrywereinthehabitofgoingtothefairatKrasniBrod，whereunmarriedwomenandwidows，surroundedbytheirrelations，awaitedtheircoming。Eachchosethewomanhelikedbest，covenantedwithherparentsastotheamountofmoneytobepaidforher，andproceededtotheceremonyofmarriage。Polishwedding-songsalsomentionthecustomofbuyingwives。
InPosnauthefollowingceremonyisstillobservedontheoccasionofabetrothal：Thebridegroomputsasmallpieceofmoneyontheshoesofhisbride，anotheronherknee，athirdonhershoulder，afourthonherhead。Itisonlywhenthisceremonyhasbeenperformedthatthefatherdeliversthemaidenintothehandsofherfuturehusband。
IhavealreadymentionedthefactthatthePaymentmadeinOldRussiabythebridegroomwasknownunderthenameofveno。
ThetruemeaningofthiswordisrevealedbytheusewhichismadeofitbythetranslatorsoftheScriptures。InaSlavonicversionofthewordsaddressedbyJacobtoLaban，whenheaskedhimforthehandofhisdaughterRachel，thetranslatorswriteasfollows：IncreasethesumofthevenoasmuchasyoulikeandI
willpayittoyou，andyoushallgivemethismaidentowife。（11*）
Inmoderntimesthevenoismentionedonlyincertainweddingsongs。Anotherterm，kladka，hasreplaceditinmostpartsofGreatRussia。Thispayment，amountingincertainpartsofRussiatothesumofonehundred，andevenoftwoorthreehundredroubles，ismadetothefatherofthebride。Asarule，thefatherdisposesofthemoneyinfavourofhisdaughter，forhegivesherasdowryalargerorsmallersum，accordingtowhathehasreceivedfromthebridegroom。Butthisfactcannotbebroughtforwardasaproofthatthekladkabelongsbyrighttothebride。
InmorethanonecommuneofthegovernmentofTamboy，Riasan，Vladimir，Moscow，SamaraandSaratov，nomentionismadeofthedowrygivenbythebride’sfather，whilstthekladkaisregularlypaidtotheheadofthefamilytowhichthebridebelongs。（12*）Wemustthereforeconsiderthesetwopayments，thatmadebythebridegroom，andthatmadebythebride’sfather，asquitedifferentinstitutions。Theonepaymentprovestheexistence，atleastincertainpartsofmodernRussia，ofamodeofmarriagesimilartothatoftheIndianAsura，theothershowsthewayinwhichthepretiumemptionis，toemployatermofRomanjurisprudence，passedintothedosordowry。ThecustomwasthesameasthatfollowedbytheGermanictribes。InsayingthisI
haveparticularlyinviewTacitus’sstatementaboutthepaymentmadebythebridegroomatamarriage，andthemorerecentfactoftheconversionofthispaymentintoadowrygivenbythebride’sfather。
ThatinformerdaysinRussiawiveswereregularlyboughtfromtheirparentsisplainlyrecognisedbythewedding-songsstillinuseamongourpeasants。
Theboyars，atermbywhichpeopledesignatethecompanionsorfollowersofthebridegroom，whoonhispartiscalled\"theduke，\"kniaz，theboyars，saysawedding-songoftheGovernmentofSaratov，\"surroundtheyardofthebride’shouseonallsides；
theybargainforourDouniascha。\"
\"Theboyarshavecoveredthegroundwithgold，\"singthecountrypeopleofWhiteRussia。
ThebridegroomisveryoftenmentionedinthesongsofthepeasantsofGreatRussiaasthe\"merchant，\"whistthebrideisspokenofas\"merchandise。\"IntheGovernmentofJaroslav，forinstance，thebride，followinganancientusage，complainsofthetreatmenttowhichshewillbesubjected，sayingthat\"unknownmerchantswilltakeherawayfromherfatherandherdearmother。\"（13*）
Nowthatwehavecarefullypassedinreviewthedifferentaspectsunderwhichmatrimonialrelationshavebeenviewed，orstillareviewed，bythecountrypeopleofRussia，wemaybeallowedtosay，thatRussianethnographyquitecorroboratesthetheoryastotheevolutionofmarriagewhichEnglishscholarswerethefirsttoestablish。Theauthorof\"PrimitiveCulture，\"
aswellasthegreatandpowerfulgeniuswhohassomarvellouslycontinuedtheworkofAugusteComte，andlastlythenumerousfollowersoftheman，whosestudiesinancienthistoryhaveunveiledforusthemysteriesoftheearlyfamilywill，Ihavenodoubt，bepleasedtoseetheirviewsconfirmedbytheearlylawandthestilllivingcustomofoneoftheprincipalbranchesoftheAryanrace。Nothingmore，itseemstome，iswantingtothemoderntheoryofthematriarchatethanasolidbaseofhistoricalfacts。Solongasobscuremythsandthemoreorlesssuperficialobservationsofmissionariesandtouristsconstitutedthematerialsforatheorywhosechiefpurposeistoshowusthesocialstateofourmostremoteancestors，objectionslikethoseofSirHenryMaineorMrStarckefoundareadyear。ThefactthatamongtheKamilaroiandtheKuruaitherightofthehusbandisignored，doesnotnecessarilyimplythatourancestorshadnonotionofmarriageandthepatriapotestas；andthenumerousGreekmythsonwhichBachofenhasestablishedhishypothesisofanyearlyGreekgyneocracymaypossiblybelongtothenumberofthosewanderinglegendsonwhichitisverydifficulttofoundanopinionastothesocialstateofthisorthatparticularpeople。
Consultthe\"Sociology\"ofHerbertSpencer，andespeciallythechaptersinwhichhetreatsoftheearlyformsofmarriage，andyouwill，Iamsure，besurprisedatthediscoverythatscarcelyanymentionismadeofthelegalantiquitiesofpeoplesbelongingtotheAryanrace。Thisisaseriousdefect，andthesooneritisremediedthebetter。SomemeasureshavealreadybeentakentothisendbythemodernschoolofGermanjuristswho，undertheableguidanceofProfessorKohler，publishamostinterestingperiodicalcalledtheZeitschriftfurdievergleichendeRechtswissenschaft。ItiswithanobjectsimilartotheirsthatIhaveundertakenmyresearchesinthevastfieldofSlavoniclawandcustom。WhatIhavesaidaboutitinthislecture，littlethoughithasbeen，may，perchance，inducesomeofyoutoundertakefreshstudiesinthisregionwhichisstillsolittleexplored。Icanpromiseallwhowillventure，themostabundantandhappyresults。
NOTES：
1。ThelasttimeinanarticleonthepatriarchalfamilypublishedintheQuarterlyReview。
2。CompareLange，\"OntheMutualRights，accordingtoOldRussianLaw，ofHusbandandWifeasregardsFortune。\"Petersburg，1886。
3。\"DasLandrechtvonKloster。\"（XVIc。）ed。byMohr。
4。Smirnov，\"SketchesofFamilyRelationsaccordingtotheCustomaryLawoftheRussians\"（Moscow，1877）pp。105，106。
5。Ivanischev，\"DissertationontheRightsoftheIndividualaccordingtotheOldLawsoftheBohemians。\"CompleteWorks，p。
92。
6。Ribnikov，\"TheSongsoftheRussianPeople。\"vol。i，p。64。
KirschaDanilov，\"OldRussianPoems\"pp。9and70。Afanasiev，\"TalesoftheRussianPeople。\"vol。i，p。484。
7。\"AntiquarischeBriefe，\"1880，p。167。McLennan，\"ThePatriarchalTheory，\"ch。vi。p。71。
8。Afanasiev\"Folk-tales\"vol。i，pp。211，212。
9。Schein，\"SongsoftheWhiteRussians。\"
10。Tereschenko，\"SocialLifeoftheRussians，：vol。iv，p。280。
11。Genesis，xxix。
12。Lange，p。86。
13。Titov，\"CustomaryVillageLaw。\"NicolaPerevosintheDistrictofRostov（Jaroslav，1888），AppendixN。5。
ModernCustomsandAncientLawsofRussiabyMaximeKovalevskyLectureII
TheStateoftheModernRussianFamily，andParticularlythatoftheJointorHouseholdCommunityofGreatRussiaWebelievethatthetheoryofthematriarchatefindsasolidbasisinthepasthistoryoftheRussianfamily。Thepresentconditionofthelatterseemstoprovethatthenextstageinitsevolutionwasthehouseholdcommunity，composedofpersonsunitedbydescentfromacommonforefatherandaccompaniedbythatworshipofancestorswhichusuallyresultedfromit。Thecompletesubjectionofthewifetothehusband，andofthechildrentothefather；communityofgoodsandthecommonenjoymentoftheirproducebytherelativeslivingunderthesameroof；theacknowledgedsuperiorityofoldageandofdirectdescentfromthecommonancestor；thetotalabsenceoftestamentarydispositionsofproperty，andevenofthatmodeoflegalsuccessionwhichsupposespartition，andtheexclusionofthemoreremotebythenearerkin；theeliminationofwomenfromparticipationinthefamilyestatebecausemarriagemakesthemaliens；allthesefeaturesofthepatriarchalfamilysoablyillustratedintheworksofSirHenryMaine，reappearinthemodernconstitutionoftheRussianfamily。Imean，ofcourse，thatofthecountrypeople，themiddleandhigherclasseshavingalreadyadoptedEuropeanmannersandcustoms，andbeingonthataccountsubjectedtoalegislationwhich，onmorethanonepoint，isindirectoppositiontocustomarylaw。
Letusstudyonebyonethecharacteristicfeaturesofthisfamilyconstitutionofthepeasant，aconstitutionmorelikethatoftheearlyCeltsandGermansthanthatofanyofthemodernnationsofEurope。
ThegreatimportancestillattachedbytheRussianpeasanttoagnatism，thatistorelationshiponthefather’sside，isshownbythepartwhichancestorworshipplaysevennowatthecelebrationofacountrywedding。Beforebecomingamemberofherhusband’sfamily，thebridemustseverallthetieswhichhavehithertoboundhertothehouse-spiritsunderwhoseprotectionshehaspassedheryouth，andmustsolemnlyadopttheworshipofthoseofthefamilyintowhichsheisabouttoenter。ThispublicmanifestationofachangeofworshipismostclearlyseenintheweddingceremoniesoftheSouthernSlavs。ItisnotsodistinctlypreservedinthoseoftheEasternSlavs。Boththeseracesbeingidenticalastotheiroriginandnature，Iwillbeginbyfirststatingthereligiouscustoms，customsofanundoubtedlypaganorigin——stillinuseatBulgarianbetrothals。\"InLika，\"saysM。Bogisic，\"thebride，beforeleavingherfather’shouse，goesthreetimesroundthehearth，prostratingherself。eachtime，asiftoimploreforgiveness。\"Asyouareawareoftheintimateconnectionwhichhasexistedbetweentheworshipofthehearthandthatofthefamilyancestors，IneednottellyouthattheactperformedbytheBulgarianbridebeforeleavingherparent’shousehasnoothermeaningthanthatofalastinvocationofthehouse-spiritswhoseworshipsheisonthepointofabandoning。
Thespiritsaresupposedtobehurtbythedecisionshehastakentowithdrawtoherhusband’shomestead，andtobeappeasedbyanactofhumiliationonherpart。Whensheisonceinthebridegroom’shousethemaidenisobligedtoperformanotherceremony；shemustseatherselfclosetothehearth，inordertokeepupforashorttimethefireburningthereonbypiecesofwoodthrownontoitwithherownhands。Thesymbolicalcharacterofthisceremonymayeasilybeperceived。Theyoungwifeisonthepointofbecomingamemberofthehousecommunityofherhusband，andassuch，aparticipantinitsfamilyworship。Heracquiescencemustbeexpressedbyasymbol，andherkeepingupthefireonthehearthispreciselysuchasymbol。ThecustomjustdescribedexistsalloverBulgariaandhasbeenmorethanoncealludedtobymodernethnographers，M。Bogisic，Mr。Krauss，andothers。
LetusnowexaminethecorrespondingcustomsoftheRussianpeasantry。InlittleRussiathebride，whileherfatherisdiscussingthequestionofhermarriagewiththepersonsentbythebridegroom，isobligedbycustomtoremainnearthehearth，towardswhichshestretchesoutherhand。Bysodoingsheexpressesherdesirestilltoremainundertheprotectionofthehouse-spiritsofherfamily，theso-called\"domovoi。\"Acenturyago，accordingtothestatementofKalinovsky，thedayonwhichthebridewastakentothehouseofherfuturehusband，agreatfirewaslightedintheyardbeforeit，andtheyoungcouplewereobligedtocrossitsittingintheircarriage。ThiscustomisstillobservedincertainpartsoftheGovernmentofKiev，butonlyinthosecasesinwhichthebrideisknowntohavemisbehavedbeforemarriage。Heapsofstrawarekindledonsuchoccasionsintheyardbeforethebridegroom’shouse，andthebridewhohaspassedsafelyoverthesefiresisconsideredtobepurified。Butthisdoesnotpreventher，assoonasshehasenteredthehouseofherhusband，fromseekingrefugeatthehearth，whereshestandsforawhilesingingacarol，themeaningofwhichisthatshelamentsherpastbadconductandpromisestobeagoodwife。
Ibegyoutoobservethatthefiresarelightedintheyardofthebridegroom’shouseandthattheyaretobeconsideredasbeingindirectrelationwiththehouse-communitytowhichhebelongs。Noteveryfirehasthepowerofpurification，onlythatwhichrepresentsthefamilyhearth。Itistothishearththattheyoungwifeappealsforprotection，shouldshehaveanyreasontofearanyill-treatmentfromherhusband’sfamily，onaccountofherformerconduct；itisbeforethishearththatsheconfessesandrepentsandpromisestobeagoodandfaithfulwife。
Inasociety，inwhichtheinterestsofthefamilyconstantlyprevailoverthoseoftheindividual（andsuchiscertainlythecaseinallpatriarchalsocieties，andamongstthemtheRussian），thereisnoroomformarriagescontractedbythemutualconsentoftheyoungpeople。IdonotmeantosaythatRussianparents，whosedutyitistofindsuitablematchesfortheirsonsanddaughters，nevertakeintoaccountthefeelingsofthosetheyintendtounite。Iwishonlytoimpressonyoutheideathattheyarenotobligedtodosobycustom。OnmorethanoneoccasionRussiancustomarycourtshaveplainlyexpressedtheopinionthatamarriagecontractconcludedbythebride’sfatherwiththatofthefuturehusbandisalegalact，fortheinfringementofwhichamendsoughttobemadebytherestitutiontothepartywrongedofthelossheorshemayhavesustained。
